Support the Wall Street Examiner! Choose your level of support to receive a free proprietary report as my thanks. Click the button below to see your options. Become a Patron!

The Countries Producing the Most E-Waste

This is a syndicated repost courtesy of Statista | Infographics. To view original, click here. Reposted with permission.

According to the Global E-waste Monitor, 53.6 million tons of electronic waste was generated worldwide in 2020. The figure increased by 21 percent in just five years, making e-waste the fastest growing domestic waste stream in the world. The largest producer of electronic waste is China with a total of 10.1 million tons. In relative terms, however, the Chinese are a long way from the world’s top at 7.2 kilograms per capita.

In comparison, many European and Anglo nations produce upwards of 20 kilograms per capita annually. Scandinavian countries rank especially high. Norway leads the ranking at 26 kilograms of e-waste per capita and year – a number potentially upped by the prevalence of electric cars in the country whose batteries count as (enormous chunks of) e-waste. The UK ranks second at close to 24 kilograms per capita, while Australia and the U.S. produce between 21 and 22 kilograms.

Another factor in the rapid growth of e-waste is appliances becoming cheaper but are more seldomly built to last. But according to the researchers at the United Nations University compiling the report, the growth of e-waste volumes also signals a rise in living standards around the world, as more and more people are able to afford appliances that make everyday life easier. While the growth of e-waste might therefore not be entirely stoppable, the makers of the report caution that recycling and safe disposal capacities have to grow at the same pace as e-waste streams in order to keep up.

This chart shows the countries producing the most e-waste per capita in 2020.

e-waste by country

Wall Street Examiner Disclosure: Lee Adler, The Wall Street Examiner reposts third party content with the permission of the publisher. The opinions expressed in these reposts are not those of the Wall Street Examiner or Lee Adler, unless authored by me, under my byline. I curate posts here on the basis of whether they represent an interesting and logical point of view, that may or may not agree with my own views. Some of the content includes the original publisher's promotional messages. No endorsement of such content is either expressed or implied by posting the content. All items published here are matters of information and opinion, and are neither intended as, nor should you construe it as, individual investment advice. Do your own due diligence when considering the offerings of information providers, or considering any investment.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.