Support the Wall Street Examiner! Choose your level of support to receive a free proprietary report as my thanks. Click the button below to see your options. Become a Patron!

ISM At A Job Cutting 56.0

This is a syndicated repost courtesy of Alhambra Investments. To view original, click here. Reposted with permission.

Though there’s not much to add, it’s worth bringing this up again. In the era of gigantic positives, why aren’t sentiment surveys so much more positive than they are? It’s because these PMI numbers aren’t what you’re being told they are. After such a huge contraction, mid-50’s is a bomb; mid-50’s (the best ones) in August 2020 is a real concern. Seeing these numbers, everyone should be asking instead, where’s the uniform acceleration and pickup?

Liquidity moves markets!

Follow the money. Find the profits! 

The ISM’s Manufacturing Index tacked on another 1.8 points to rise up to 56.0 last month. That’s the highest since November 2018, which isn’t anywhere close to as good as it might sound. From this time last month:

The way the Institute for Supply Management (ISM) versions are being reported, however, these other must be describing an entirely different set of circumstances… Quite the contrary, even for both of the ISM’s, for them to be back even only to the same level of March or February 2019 isn’t exactly a reassuring outcome. Does anyone remember the winter of 2019? If that wasn’t bad enough, following the scale and depth of contraction the US economy is trying to find its way out from, these PMI’s should be (actually) skyrocketing and quickly.

That’s why if the economy was turning around as robustly as the PMI’s are being interpreted as suggesting, then we wouldn’t have the ISM reporting more manufacturers are still cutting jobs than those that are rehiring again.

This isn’t just a weird discrepancy; it’s the only one that matters. An ISM at 56.0 this far into 2020 isn’t near enough of a widespread turnaround and it seems like the manufacturers themselves concur.

Wall Street Examiner Disclosure: Lee Adler, The Wall Street Examiner reposts third party content with the permission of the publisher. The opinions expressed in these reposts are not those of the Wall Street Examiner or Lee Adler, unless authored by me, under my byline. I curate posts here on the basis of whether they represent an interesting and logical point of view, that may or may not agree with my own views. Some of the content includes the original publisher's promotional messages. No endorsement of such content is either expressed or implied by posting the content. All items published here are matters of information and opinion, and are neither intended as, nor should you construe it as, individual investment advice. Do your own due diligence when considering the offerings of information providers, or considering any investment.

Try Lee Adler's Technical Trader risk free for 90 days! Follow the money. Find the profits!

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.