Menu Close

145% China Tariffs Will Cause a Depression Says AI Analysis

Mainstream narratives do not, and will not be able to, cover the full implications of a 145% tariff on Chinese goods, especially given how sudden and extreme such a policy would be. Let’s walk through several scenarios under this regime, starting from the immediate shock to the long-term economic and labor market consequences.

Scenario 1: Immediate Shock to Retail Chains and Consumers

  1. Massive Price Inflation Across Consumer Goods:

    • Retail chains like Walmart, Target, and other major U.S. retailers heavily reliant on Chinese imports would face a direct 145% price increase on many of their goods. This could range from electronics, clothing, household items, to toys and food products, among others.

    • Given that Walmart’s cost structure is built on maintaining low margins with high turnover, a 145% tariff would immediately price many goods out of reach for a significant portion of U.S. consumers.

    • The sheer scale of the tariff would result in a massive price increase, leading to a sharp contraction in consumer demand. Middle- and lower-income Americans would be most impacted, as Walmart and other retailers are a primary source of affordable goods.

  2. Market Contraction and Economic Recession:

    • Retail sales would plummet across nearly all categories. If consumers are hit with these inflated prices, discretionary spending would fall off a cliff. It’s reasonable to expect that total retail sales could decline by 10-25% or more in the first quarter after the tariffs are enacted.

    • The retail sector contraction could trigger broader economic repercussions. Retail is a massive part of the U.S. economy, and if major retailers like Walmart and Target experience massive sales losses, the ripple effect would be felt across related industries: shipping, warehousing, logistics, raw materials (for manufacturing), and more.

  3. Supply Chain Disruptions:

    • No goods would ship from China to the U.S. at a 145% tariff level. The financial incentive to import at that level would disappear for many companies. Even if some companies continued to import, the price hike would be so extreme that it might force them to abandon Chinese imports altogether.

    • The lack of imports would lead to massive shortages in popular consumer products. Shelves at stores would empty quickly, leading to stockouts and disruptions in the retail experience. Consumers, already reeling from price increases, would face supply shortages, which could lead to panic buying and stockpiling of essential goods.

Scenario 2: Corporate Responses and Job Losses

  1. Widespread Corporate Layoffs:

    • Retailers would begin cutting back on store staff to offset the reduced revenue from sales losses. Walmart and other large chains would likely implement hiring freezes and begin reducing headcount in their stores and distribution centers.

    • Corporate functions, particularly those tied to supply chain and logistics, would also see significant layoffs. Purchasing, inventory management, and logistics teams would be drastically reduced as companies scale down their product lines and seek alternatives to Chinese-sourced goods.

    • Millions of retail jobs would be at risk. Walmart employs around 2.3 million people globally (many of whom are in the U.S.). If the company’s sales are slashed by 20-30%, it’s conceivable that they could lay off several hundred thousand people, if not more. Similar reductions would happen across other retailers heavily reliant on Chinese imports.

  2. Outsourcing and Offshoring:

    • Even though the tariffs would encourage some companies to look for alternatives in places like India, Vietnam, or Mexico, these countries cannot immediately replace the scale of Chinese production. Shifting production is a time-consuming process. Six months to a year might be needed just to stabilize new suppliers. In the meantime, companies will suffer from supply chain gaps and price inflation.

    • There will be a push to move jobs overseas, particularly in manufacturing, as companies will look for places to source their goods at lower tariffs, even if that means outsourcing jobs out of the U.S. That process would create further dislocation in the labor market.

  3. The Impact on Chinese and U.S. Workers:

    • Chinese factories will also suffer severe disruption. The dramatic tariff increase would likely cause many manufacturers to cut back on production, leading to layoffs and factory closures across China. The knock-on effect on the Chinese economy would be immense, resulting in widespread unemployment in certain industrial sectors. While China could pivot its manufacturing model to focus on internal demand or exports to other countries, it would face significant structural challenges.

    • U.S. retail workers would bear the brunt of these changes. Many low-wage retail jobs, especially in entry-level positions, would disappear. The people most impacted would be those at the bottom of the wage scale, disproportionately affecting people already in precarious economic conditions.

Scenario 3: Long-Term Economic Depression and Labor Market Disruption

  1. Economic Depression:

    • If the tariffs remain in place long-term, we could see a deepening economic depression. The retail sector accounts for a significant portion of U.S. GDP, and if consumer spending drops substantially, the wider economy will stall. Unemployment will spike not only in retail but across other industries tied to retail.

    • The housing market could also feel the strain. Home sales tend to track with consumer confidence and spending. If consumers lose jobs and wages stagnate, people will stop buying homes or downsizing, further exacerbating the economic downturn.

  2. Job Losses in Service and Transportation Sectors:

    • Transportation and logistics jobs would also be hit. U.S. port workers, truck drivers, and warehouse employees would face a sharp decline in their workloads. The contraction in retail sales would lead to a severe reduction in shipments, leading to layoffs in shipping and transportation-related jobs.

    • Service workers in related industries (e.g., fast food, restaurants, and local businesses) would see job cuts as disposable income shrinks and consumers scale back on spending.

  3. Wider Global Economic Impact:

    • A trade war of this magnitude wouldn’t just hurt U.S. retail jobs; it would have a ripple effect on the global economy. Supply chain breakdowns in China, the U.S., and the countries that act as alternatives to China would create a global slowdown. Countries with growing export industries might face diminishing returns, leading to a widespread global recession.


Conclusion:

The 145% tariff on Chinese goods would lead to a catastrophic shock to the U.S. retail sector and broader economy. There is a high likelihood that:

  1. Sales losses across all retail chains, particularly those relying on Chinese imports, would be massive, possibly leading to an overall decline of 15-25% in retail sales.

  2. Job losses would be in the millions. Between retail layoffs, job cuts in logistics and transportation, and further outsourcing, the employment toll would be severe.

  3. Supply chain disruptions would create chronic shortages of goods, exacerbating the economic pain.

  4. A prolonged economic depression is a real possibility, with reduced consumer spending, unemployment, and a cascading series of negative effects in related industries.

In conclusion: No goods would ship from China under such a regime because the cost shock would be too high for many businesses to absorb or pass on. The economic depression and job losses could be deeper and more prolonged than most expect.

Leave a Comment

Discover more from The Wall Street Examiner

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading