Menu Close
Posted in Other Guys

Industrial Drag

This is a syndicated repost courtesy of Alhambra Investments. To view original, click here. Reposted with permission.

Completing a busy day of US economic data, Industrial Production was, like retail sales and inflation data, highly disappointing. Prior months were revised slightly lower, leaving IP year-over-year up just 2% in June 2017 (estimates for May were initially 2.2%). Revisions included, the annual growth rate has been stuck around 2% now for three months in a row, suggesting like those other accounts a pause or even possible end to the mini-improvement cycle.

The trajectory for US industry on the plus side now continues to undershoot both the 2002-03 as well as the 1992-93 “jobless recoveries.” In that respect, Industrial Production has yet to reach 2014 comparisons; average growth in 2014 was a small 3.5% at the highest average that year, whereas in 2017 the 6-month average is but 1.2%.

Production of consumer goods has been largely flat and sideways going back to the eventful summer of 2015. Despite an overall economic shift toward positive growth again, US manufacturers haven’t been given any boost in the consumer segment – even though production levels here are still 8% below the peak in 2007 a decade ago.

The primary reason for downside weakness continues to be domestic auto production. For the sixth consecutive month, motor vehicle assemblies were estimated to have been less than 12 million (SAAR). That is about equal in production runs to 2014, meaning well behind the growth pace of that year.

Auto production is right now merely keeping up with lower sales. Unless consumers start buying up what has been piled up in inventory, at some point in the near future carmakers are going to have to make deeper cuts. At the moment, they are going at record incentive rates just to keep sales from falling further, cutting into profits as a short-term solution.

In June, total assemblies were only slightly more than in May (11.49mm vs. 11.44mm), both months among the lowest going back to 2014. If such a low factory run rate is still contributing to inventory, especially dealer stock, then it seems very possible the seasonal summer production slowdown could turn more serious (though to what degree depends on a number of factors). With retail sales confirming little growth on the consumer side, how much longer will auto manufacturers continue to offer record incentives for slightly negative sales?

The issue may turn on liquidity and financial conditions, which at the moment are more favorable than they were a year ago (“rate hikes” just don’t matter). Inventory has to be financed, and in a normal cycle deteriorating inventory ratios lead to a pullback in flexible finance (including on the consumer side) that eventually triggers inventory liquidation and the drastic, recessionary production cuts. Given these auto imbalances, re-emergence of the “rising dollar” or whatever the next one will be could be even more serious, for more than just autos, at the next downturn (which sounds preposterous given that we just got out of one; the 2012 slowdown, however, lasted into early and even middle 2013, meaning that the 2014 upturn was itself only a year long, a year and a half at most).

Capacity Utilization was 76.6% in June, up from a downwardly revised 76.4% in May. Industrial efficiency continues to lag even the small overall improvement in general IP. The estimated utilization rate is still several percentage points below the peak in 2014, which was already less than the low cyclical peak in 2007.

Even with a small increase in the past few months, capacity utilization is equal to about mid-2011. That puts especially manufacturers in a difficult bind as sales don’t progress anywhere close to normal, let alone with symmetry after two years of a serious downturn.

In other words, there is no momentum anywhere in US industry and really no reason to expect it. The most charitable that might be said of this crucial economic sector is that it isn’t operating like 2016. But 2017 isn’t proving to be all the different, either.

Wall Street Examiner Disclosure: Lee Adler, The Wall Street Examiner reposts third party content with the permission of the publisher. The opinions expressed in these reposts are not those of the Wall Street Examiner or Lee Adler, unless authored by me, under my byline. I curate posts here on the basis of whether they represent an interesting and logical point of view, that may or may not agree with my own views. Some of the content includes the original publisher's promotional messages. No endorsement of such content is either expressed or implied by posting the content. All items published here are matters of information and opinion, and are neither intended as, nor should you construe it as, individual investment advice. Do your own due diligence when considering the offerings of information providers, or considering any investment.

Related Posts

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.