After holding off on an interest rate hike pre-election to help Clinton, Yellen finally pulled the trigger on Wednesday…
Liquidity moves markets!Follow the money. Find the profits!
For the first time in a year, the Federal Reserve raised the federal funds rate a quarter of a percentage point to 0.50%.
The stock market game didn’t like the news. The Dow Jones closed down 118 points for the day.
And predictably, market “experts” drew all the wrong conclusions from the Fed’s move.
The Fed’s Revelation
The rate hike wasn’t a surprise. Everyone with a pulse knew it was 100% priced in beforehand.
But what did shock and unnerve assorted “analysts” were the Fed’s rate projection talking points for 2017.
Now, a plurality of the Fed’s rate-setting committee believes the central bank will raise rates three times next year, compared with two hikes expected in the batch of projections released in September.
The possibility of accelerated interest rate increases caused the dollar to soar against all major currencies. (The higher interest rate that can be earned from the dollar increases its demand and value.)
And it caused gold to take it on the chin, hitting a 9-month low. (The dollar is more attractive in times of rising rates as it’s an interest-bearing asset, as opposed to gold.)
But let’s unpack this…
The negative market reaction happened because the Fed indicated it anticipated raising rates three times in 2017 instead of its previous statement of two.
Well, after the Fed raised interest rates for the first time in a decade in December 2015, Fed politicians projected four hikes for 2016. But there was only one. Not even close.
Knowing this, who in their right mind would pay attention to such forward “guidance” for next year, or any year for that matter?
To be fair, maybe last year’s ridiculously bad Fed projection was just an outlier.
Yeah, not so much…
To see how misleading the Fed’s interest rate hike projections have been in recent years, have a look at the chart below.
As you can see, projected interest rate hikes compared to actual rate hikes differ drastically.
I don’t know what’s worse… the Fed’s forward guidance track record or the people who actually trade on that guidance.
Yet there I was on Wednesday night watching a Harvard-educated “analyst” on Fox News telling “Special Report” anchor Brett Baier that the most important thing investors needed to be concerned with was the Fed’s plan to raise rates three times in 2017.
That’s utterly worthless advice.
Hold on. I am being kind.
That’s moronic advice.
The data clearly shows that the Fed doesn’t do what is says it’s going to do.
Look, does anyone not sniffing bath salts believe the Fed is going to continue raising rates on schedule if the U.S. stock market craters… or if Europe implodes… or if China’s credit bubble bursts?
There are countless Fed “variables” it will use to justify altering its plan… as it has in years past.
The bottom line is the only thing of value we learned from the Fed this week is they raised rates on Wednesday.
What it does in 2017 has no relation to its stated projections, just as was the case in 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016.
Worrying about the implications of the Fed’s rate hike timetable is a time-sucking charade designed to bleed you dry. The Fed and the media are never on your side.
Focus on the only truth you know, and that is the price action of all markets.
Let the price action dictate your actions, your buys and sells. That’s what winners do.
Wall Street Examiner Disclosure:Lee Adler, The Wall Street Examiner reposts third party content with the permission of the publisher. I curate posts here on the basis of whether they represent an interesting and logical point of view, that may or may not agree with my own views. Some of the content includes the original publisher's promotional messages. I may receive promotional consideration on a contingent basis, when paid subscriptions result. The opinions expressed in these reposts are not those of the Wall Street Examiner or Lee Adler, unless authored by me, under my byline. No endorsement of third party content is either expressed or implied by posting the content. Do your own due diligence when considering the offerings of information providers.