Fischer didn’t elaborate, but he said the central banks in other countries “basically think they’re quite successful.”
This is the typical vagueness offered by the Fed regarding almost any policy. However, Fischer has been a professor at the MIT Department of Economics, the governor of the Bank of Israel, and a chief economist at the World Bank. So when he weighs in on the economy, it’s worth hearing what he has to say.
The problem, though, is negative interest rates are just a theory without a proven track record. Theories are nice in the classroom, but you can’t bet the future of an entire economy on one.
Unlike Fischer, our gurus at Money Morning have been quite clear about why negative-interest-rate policies (NIRP) are a disaster…
“Negative-interest-rate policy (NIRP) is not merely some technical monetary policy tool; it is a tactic with profound political and moral consequences that must be exposed as a betrayal of the social compact between governments and citizens,”Money Morning Global Credit Strategist Michael Lewitt said on Feb. 18.
Here’s why negative interest rates don’t jive with Stanley Fischer’s rosy language…
The Devastating Reality of Negative Interest Rates
There are two major reasons why negative interest rates are not only not working, but also leading us to an economic meltdown.
First, NIRP will destroy the profitability of banks. That’s important because the financial sector accounted for nearly 17% of the total global wealth in 2014, according to Investopedia.com projections.
Just take a look at what’s happening to bank stocks in Europe right now…
Editor’s Note: You could become a Goldman Sachs partner for just one dollar.But you shouldn’t…
“Loan demand isn’t growing so banks can’t raise rates,” Money Morning Capital Wave Strategist Shah Gilani said on Feb. 24. “And worse, if depositors are going to be charged to park their money in banks, or fear they’d be denied access to their cash residing in banks, they’ll pull their deposits and create all kinds of havoc for banks.”
There’s already a case where a small German bank (Raiffeisenbank Gmund am Tegernsee) is charging its customers 0.4%, as of Sept. 1, to keep money at the bank.
And because bank customers are getting charged, people are keeping their money at home and providing the banks with less money to lend.
Paul Achleitner, chairman of Deutsche Bank, said at a June American Council on Germany event that if you give an American $100, they are likely to spend it. If you give a German $100, they are likely to save it.
And Achleitner is exactly right. Because European banks are starting to pass on the cost of negative interest rates to consumers and overall economic fear, German safe makers are experiencing a boom in sales.
According to The Wall Street Journal, Burg-Waechter KG (Germany’s biggest safe manufacturer) has seen sales jump 25% in the first half of 2016 from the same time a year ago.
Achleitner also said that Europe’s banks don’t have enough cash to protect themselves in a financial crisis and meet the requirements from the European Central Bank.
The second major reason Fischer is wrong – negative interest rates are not only not working, but also leading us to an economic meltdown – is obvious when you think about it…
Central banks simply haven’t been able to make the economy grow through negative rates.
Trending Right Now: 10 Times We Narrowly Avoided World War 3
Lewitt calls negative interest rates “desperate” and a “last ditch-measure.” Central banks should have slowly increased rates, rather than slashing them to nothing. Now, the economy isn’t strong enough to handle it.
“Comments claiming that Europe is seeing signs of economic growth as a result of negative interest rates are balderdash,” Lewitt said. “Negative interest rates do not generate growth; they destroy growth because they destroy capital.”
According to recent data, GDP growth is almost nonexistent in one of the biggest countries in the world using NIRP: Japan.
The nation’s GDP growth from January to March was a paltry 0.2%. It’s not promising to see such stagnant results from the world’s third-largest economy.
Gilani said that the Federal Reserve making interest rates nothing and quantitative easing experiments forced other central banks to follow its insane policies.
Without anyone to keep the Fed in check, things are too out of control to stop now. “But this president, too many past presidents, and the spineless money-grabbers in Congress long ago punted all fiscal responsibility and all economic policy responsibility to the big-bank owned and operated Federal Reserve System,” Gilani stated.
Gilani pointed out that this disastrous financial experiment has:
- Inflated the stock market
- Undermined economic growth
- Caused corporations to buy back shares instead of investing in plants, equipment, and labor
- Juiced up banks’ balance sheets
Of course, if Fischer would like to elaborate exactly how negative interest rates “appear to be working,” we are all ears.
About Money Morning: Money Morning gives you access to a team of ten market experts with more than 250 years of combined investing experience – for free. Our experts – who have appeared on FOXBusiness, CNBC, NPR, and BloombergTV – deliver daily investing tips and stock picks, provide analysis with actions to take, and answer your biggest market questions. Our goal is to help our millions of e-newsletter subscribers and Moneymorning.com visitors become smarter, more confident investors.
Disclaimer: © 2016 Money Morning and Money Map Press. All Rights Reserved. Protected by copyright of the United States and international treaties. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution (electronic or otherwise, including the world wide web), of content from this webpage, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of Money Morning. 16 W. Madison St. Baltimore, MD, 21201.
Wall Street Examiner Disclosure: Lee Adler, The Wall Street Examiner reposts third party content with the permission of the publisher. The opinions expressed in these reposts are not those of the Wall Street Examiner or Lee Adler, unless authored by me, under my byline. I curate posts here on the basis of whether they represent an interesting and logical point of view, that may or may not agree with my own views. Some of the content includes the original publisher's promotional messages. No endorsement of such content is either expressed or implied by posting the content. All items published here are matters of information and opinion, and are neither intended as, nor should you construe it as, individual investment advice. Do your own due diligence when considering the offerings of information providers, or considering any investment.