As discussed in the previous post (here), the markets have completely discounted the stellar US payrolls report when projecting the Fed’s policy path in 2016. Futures-implied probability of 4 rate hikes (or higher) is only 6.5%. Why is the market so “dovish” relative to the FOMC?
Liquidity moves markets!Follow the money. Find the profits!
As a backdrop, we now know from the FOMC minutes that the Committee members were quite jittery about disinflationary pressures, with many being ambivalent in their decision to raise rates in December.
|Source: FOMC Minutes, FRB|
Is the long-awaited jump in inflation about to make itself visible? Market participants remain skeptical. Here are some key reasons.
1. Most analysts have been forecasting – for some time now – a significant increase in US wages as the labor markets tighten. However thus far we have seen little evidence for this “acceleration”, with wages persistently growing below 2.5% per year.
2. With US crude oil prices below $33/bbl, many believe the energy impact on inflation is yet to be fully reflected in the official figures. Moreover, some think that weak energy prices will even partially bleed into the core PCE inflation measure (on a delayed basis).
3. China’s ongoing devaluation will continue putting pressure on prices in the US as well.
As an example, the December jump in iron ore prices has been nearly fully reversed as China-related worries returned. In addition to China’s impact on commodities, most expect US import prices to fall further, also igniting disinflationary concerns.
Of greater concern is whether China will continue devaluing the yuan further in order to stimulate its export sector. This could lead to “competitive devaluations” – or what some refer to “escalation of currency wars”. Here is a quote from Mexico’s finance minister.
FT: – “There is real concern that, in the face of the deceleration of the Chinese economy, the public policy response will be to start a round of competitive devaluations,” said Luis Videgaray, finance minister.
He called that prospect “frankly perverse” because copycat devaluations would leave everyone in the same position and would not really alter anything. Mexico’s peso floats freely, but the central bank has been auctioning dollars in recent months to shore up the currency.
In fact the trade-weighted US dollar index is now at the highest level since 2003 and “offshoring 2.0” could be the next major trend for US businesses. This of course doesn’t bode well for stronger wage growth.
4. We’ve already seen some of the impact of this dollar strength in the struggling US manufacturing sector. Growth in US services sector is moderating as well (see summary). Does it make sense to hike rates aggressively in such an environment?
5. Given some of the trends above, market-based inflation expectations remain near the lowest levels since the Great Recession. While a number of analysts as well as many Fed officials view this as a “transient” effect, these measures have remained stubbornly low for some time now.
6. Finally, a number of economists are becoming concerned about aggressive rate hikes at a time when the corporate sector is about to undergo deleveraging.
|Source: Citi research|
Of course we know that all the years of highly accommodative monetary policy in fact caused corporate leverage to rise to begin with (see post from 2014). Nevertheless, with a number of analysts calling the end of the credit cycle, managing this deleveraging process should become a consideration for the Fed this year.
These are some of the key reasons markets view four or even three rate hikes as being off the table for 2016. Some are even calling for the Fed to take rates back to the 0-25bp level. It’s unlikely the FOMC would do this because such an action would damage the central bank’s credibility. Nevertheless some are hoping the Fed would pay more attention to what the ECB is currently doing.
Sign up for our daily newsletter called the Daily Shot. It’s a quick graphical summary of topics covered here and on Twitter (see overview). Emails are NEVER sold or otherwise shared with anyone.
From our sponsor, Fitch Solutions: Sign-up for Inside Credit – a weekly wrap-up of noteworthy Fitch content delivered every Friday.
Wall Street Examiner Disclosure: Lee Adler, The Wall Street Examiner reposts third party content with the permission of the publisher. The opinions expressed in these reposts are not those of the Wall Street Examiner or Lee Adler, unless authored by me, under my byline. I curate posts here on the basis of whether they represent an interesting and logical point of view, that may or may not agree with my own views. Some of the content includes the original publisher's promotional messages. No endorsement of such content is either expressed or implied by posting the content. All items published here are matters of information and opinion, and are neither intended as, nor should you construe it as, individual investment advice. Do your own due diligence when considering the offerings of information providers, or considering any investment.