Support the Wall Street Examiner! Choose your level of support to receive a free proprietary report as my thanks. Click the button below to see your options. Become a Patron!

[CHART] How Many Oil Jobs Were Lost in 2015?

This is a syndicated repost courtesy of Money Morning - We Make Investing Profitable. To view original, click here. Reposted with permission.

For those wondering how many oil jobs were lost in 2015, Forbes reported on Oct. 22 the number had surpassed 200,000 worldwide.

While the exact figure is unknown, the 200,000 figure is a huge hit to the industry. Roughly 600,000 people worked for U.S. energy companies at the beginning of 2015.

As the following chart shows, oil field services (OFS) companies like Schlumberger Ltd. (NYSE: SLB) and Halliburton Co. (NYSE: HAL) were major contributors to the high layoff total…


Here’s why the oil field services industry has seen so many layoffs…

How Many Oil Jobs Were Lost in 2015? Ask the OFS Companies

OFS companies are tasked with actually setting up the oil wells. While many office and high-skilled employees have been laid off, it’s mostly the workers laboring in the fields who are at risk.

“The closer your job is to the actual oil well, the more in jeopardy you are of losing that job,” said Tim Cook, president of PathFinder Staffing in Houston, toThe Wall Street Journal. “Each time an oil rig gets shut down, all the jobs at the work site are gone. They disappear.”

Schlumberger – the world’s largest OFS company – laid off the most employees this year with more than 20,000 job cuts. It laid off roughly 15% of its employees and announced it will cut more jobs next year “in light of expected reduced activity for 2016 and to streamline its support structure,” according to a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filing earlier this month.

Halliburton, which is the world’s second-largest OFS company, slashed 18,000 jobs in 2015. Weatherford International Plc. (NYSE: WFT) laid off 14,000 people, or 28% of its total workforce, while Baker Hughes Inc. (NYSE: BHI) got rid of 13,000.

The reasons why so many oil jobs were lost in 2015 are explained in the Q3earnings reports. Halliburton’s $5.6 billion in third-quarter revenue was down 6% from the year-ago quarter. That was mostly due to the 53% crash in oil pricessince October 2014.

Baker Hughes reported a loss of $376 million, or $0.05 per share. Schlumberger earned $0.78 per share on revenue of $8.5 billion. That was an 11% decrease in EPS and 6% loss in revenue.

“Companies are reacting aggressively to shorten the duration of the downturn,” Steve Morse, a consultant with employment agency Russell Reynolds Associates, told Forbes. “These cuts are as dramatic as we’ve seen in this industry ever.”

Oil jobs will continue to be cut as crude oil prices hover in the $30 range. But according to Money Morning Global Energy Strategist Dr. Kent Moors, prices will see double-digit gains by the summer of 2016…

To get full access to all Money Morning content, click here

About Money Morning: Money Morning gives you access to a team of ten market experts with more than 250 years of combined investing experience – for free. Our experts – who have appeared on FOXBusiness, CNBC, NPR, and BloombergTV – deliver daily investing tips and stock picks, provide analysis with actions to take, and answer your biggest market questions. Our goal is to help our millions of e-newsletter subscribers and visitors become smarter, more confident investors.

Disclaimer: © 2015 Money Morning and Money Map Press. All Rights Reserved. Protected by copyright of the United States and international treaties. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution (electronic or otherwise, including the world wide web), of content from this webpage, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of Money Morning. 16 W. Madison St. Baltimore, MD, 21201.

The post [CHART] How Many Oil Jobs Were Lost in 2015? appeared first on Money Morning – We Make Investing Profitable.

Wall Street Examiner Disclosure: Lee Adler, The Wall Street Examiner reposts third party content with the permission of the publisher. The opinions expressed in these reposts are not those of the Wall Street Examiner or Lee Adler, unless authored by me, under my byline. I curate posts here on the basis of whether they represent an interesting and logical point of view, that may or may not agree with my own views. Some of the content includes the original publisher's promotional messages. No endorsement of such content is either expressed or implied by posting the content. All items published here are matters of information and opinion, and are neither intended as, nor should you construe it as, individual investment advice. Do your own due diligence when considering the offerings of information providers, or considering any investment.


Skating on Thin Ice, Keep Life Preservers Handy

We may be skating on very thin ice here, but the weight of the evidence still supports a weak bull case for the near to intermediate term. So I’m adding buy picks on the chart pick list and adjusting trailing stops to account for the risk.

Technical Trader subscribers click here to download the report.

Not a subscriber? Follow Lee’s weekly swing trade chart picks with Lee Adler’s Technical Trader, risk free for 90 days!  

These reports are not investment advice. They are for informational purposes, for a broad audience of investment and trading professionals, and other experienced investors and traders. Chart pick performance changes week to week and past performance may not indicate future results, as you know. Trading involves risk, and these reports assume that you understand those risks and manage them according to your tolerance. 

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.