Menu Close
Posted in Money Morning

Trump vs. Bush at the CNN Debate: Here’s Who Bluffed on Florida Casino Claims

This is a syndicated repost courtesy of Money Morning - We Make Investing Profitable. To view original, click here. Reposted with permission.

If you watched the CNN debate this past Wednesday, then you witnessed the notoriousTrump vs. Bush casino spat.

It started when moderator Jake Tapper noted a portion of Donald Trump‘s popularity relies on the fact that he cannot be bought by lobbyists. This, Tapper suggested, makes his GOP presidential opponents susceptible to the whims of special interest groups – particularly former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush.

Bush’s presidential campaign has raised an unprecedented $100 million so far. Trump claims this makes Bush a “puppet for his donors.”

Jeb attempted to turn the tables on Trump. He stated, “The one guy that had some special interests that I know of, that tried to get me to change my views on something, that was generous and gave me money… was Donald Trump. He wanted casino gambling in Florida.”

Trump’s response? “I did not.”

The candidates continued to banter until Trump blurted, “I promise, if I wanted it, I would’ve gotten it.” Sweeping laughter from the crowd ensued. Here’s the clip:

The exchange left many viewers wondering which candidate was telling the truth.

Here’s the answer…

Trump vs. Bush: The Truth About a Casino Push in Florida

Donald Trump donated to Jeb Bush’s 1998 gubernatorial campaign while he was actively lobbying to change gambling laws in Florida, CNN recently reported on Sept. 1. The real estate magnate forked over $50,000. He also held a $500-a-person fundraiser in Bush’s honor at New York City’s Trump Tower.

Furthermore, “The Donald” hired Mallory Horne, a former Florida state house speaker, to lobby on gambling issues on his behalf down in the Sunshine State, reported CBS News on Sept. 16. Trump then joined sides with the Seminole Tribe of Florida to push gambling laws from bingo up to full-scale casinos.

Meanwhile, a significant part of Bush’s gubernatorial campaign platform was against the expansion of gambling in Florida. In fact, his position helped win him the governorship.

“I am opposed to casino gambling in this state and I am opposed whether it is on Indian property or otherwise … The people have spoken and I support their position,” Bush told The St. Petersburg Times (now The Tampa Bay Times) on June 18, 1999, referencing three failed referendums to approve casino gambling.

Eventually Trump gave up the fight, just before Bush won his campaign for governor. Many suspect he sensed defeat on the issue.

Interestingly enough, the U.S. Department of the Interior and the federal Indian Gaming Regulatory Act are currently working with the Seminole Indiana Tribe of Florida to reform the current gambling laws there, according to The Daily Beast on Sept. 18.

But Donald Trump will not be enjoying the profits of any such venture.

To get full access to all Money Morning content, click here

About Money Morning: Money Morning gives you access to a team of ten market experts with more than 250 years of combined investing experience – for free. Our experts – who have appeared on FOXBusiness, CNBC, NPR, and BloombergTV – deliver daily investing tips and stock picks, provide analysis with actions to take, and answer your biggest market questions. Our goal is to help our millions of e-newsletter subscribers and visitors become smarter, more confident investors.

Disclaimer: © 2015 Money Morning and Money Map Press. All Rights Reserved. Protected by copyright of the United States and international treaties. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution (electronic or otherwise, including the world wide web), of content from this webpage, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of Money Morning. 16 W. Madison St. Baltimore, MD, 21201.


The post Trump vs. Bush at the CNN Debate: Here’s Who Bluffed on Florida Casino Claims appeared first on Money Morning. Reposted with permission.

Wall Street Examiner Disclosure: Lee Adler, The Wall Street Examiner reposts third party content with the permission of the publisher. The opinions expressed in these reposts are not those of the Wall Street Examiner or Lee Adler, unless authored by me, under my byline. I curate posts here on the basis of whether they represent an interesting and logical point of view, that may or may not agree with my own views. Some of the content includes the original publisher's promotional messages. No endorsement of such content is either expressed or implied by posting the content. All items published here are matters of information and opinion, and are neither intended as, nor should you construe it as, individual investment advice. Do your own due diligence when considering the offerings of information providers, or considering any investment.

Related Posts

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.