Menu Close

Why Are We Speculating About When The Fed Will Raise Rates When The Real Issue Is How

Back in the good old days the Fed more or less controlled interest rates by keeping reserves tight and by adding or removing reserves daily, mostly via its open market repo operations. The Fed would announce a target rate for Fed Funds, and the market would trade around that rate because the Fed could make these daily adjustments to the cash in the system, tightening or loosening the market as needed day to day.

But today there are $2.8 trillion in excess reserves on its balance sheet. Those reserves are the banks’ cash assets that are on deposit at the Fed. It’s the banks’ cash. They can do what they want with it. They usually buy short term paper or maybe bonds or even stocks. But it’s always there sloshing around the banking system, as noted on line 34 and footnote 21 of the Fed’s H8 weekly statement on the US banking system. It circulates around from bank to bank, or to and from the US Treasury to the banks, but it never leaves the banking system. So the Fed can’t manipulate the market by fiddling with reserves as it once did.

Apparently the Fed’s new method of raising rates will be to wave a magic wand, say “Abracadabra, rates go up!” and rates will magically rise just because everybody believes that the Fed is the great and powerful Oz. Now that might work for a little while, but all that excess cash will still be out there in some form, and I think that anyone who thinks that banks won’t bid aggressively to make loans or buy short term paper is kidding themselves. There might be a published official Fed rate of one kind or another that’s 25 basis points higher than before, but in the real world, unless that excess cash begins to be removed from the system, actual market rates at which banks transact actual bidness probably won’t rise much, if at all.

Since the Fed hasn’t made a peep about selling assets, or even just letting them run off as they mature, those reserves aren’t going anywhere any time soon. All that cash will still be out there in one form or another, regardless of whether the Fed calls them deposits, or RRPs, or Term Deposits, on its balance sheet. To the banks, it makes little difference. All are cash or near cash assets to them. A deposit, by any other name, is still a deposit.

Now the Fed says no worries, we can raise rates by paying the banks a higher interest rate on their reserve accounts, or by paying them more interest via reverse repos or term deposits, both of which increase the taxpayer subsidy to the banks. Yeah that’s the ticket, the banks will raise market interest rates because the Fed will be giving them billions more each month in guaranteed, money for nothing, free income.

That in turn will come out of our pockets because it will reduce the Fed’s income, which it returns to the Treasury. So we end up paying a subsidy to the banks. They get more guaranteed free income. I’m just wondering.  What do we get in this shell game? That’s right. We get scammed. Again.

I had a bit of a rant about this in my interview with Lindsay Williams last month. The audio below is set to begin where I hit on this issue at the 7:30 mark.

And my February 18 “explainer” for Radio Free Wall Street subscribers.


Join the conversation and have a little fun at If you are a new visitor to the Stool, please register and join in! To post your observations and charts, and snide, but good-natured, comments, click here to register. Be sure to respond to the confirmation email which is sent instantly. If not in your inbox, check your spam filter.


  1. DavidSchreiner

    seems like the only solution is to stop paying IOER or cap the amount of reserves a banks can hold.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow by Email

Discover more from The Wall Street Examiner

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading