What is wrong with the international banking system? In order to maintain sustainable global economic growth, the banking system needs to be functional and profitable. Bank shareholders should be enjoying declining default rates that result in stable dividends and better capitalization. Instead we get this:
- Bloomberg: – The paper is the first to raise the possibility that the five banks overseeing the century-old rate — Barclays Plc, Deutsche Bank AG, Bank of Nova Scotia, HSBC Holdings Plc and Societe Generale SA — may have been actively working together to manipulate the benchmark. It also adds to pressure on the firms to overhaul the way the rate is calculated. Authorities around the world, already investigating the manipulation of benchmarks from interest rates to foreign exchange, are examining the $20 trillion gold market for signs of wrongdoing.
- NY Times: – Barclays said on Tuesday that it would cut as many 12,000 jobs this year, or about 8 percent of its work force, as part of a painful restructuring that began a year ago. The chief executive of the British bank, Antony P. Jenkins, has been trying to overhaul Barclays and revive its image in the eyes of British consumers after a series of scandals in the last few years, including the manipulation of global interest rate benchmarks. Mr. Jenkins took the top job in 2012 after the ouster of Robert E. Diamond Jr.
- Forbes: – Fraudulent dealings by a client tied to Mexico’s oil industry have landed Citigroup’s subsidiary in the country in trouble and forced the bank to revise its previously-reported 2013 earnings. According to the bank’s announcement Friday, Mexican subsidiary Banamex extended $585 million of credit to an oil services company in Mexico known as OSA. The financing was for accounts receivable from the country’s state-owned oil business Pemex, which informed Citigroup that the valid receivables were far less than the figure held up by OSA.
- CBS: – Billions of dollars in U.S. taxes are going unpaid because Americans are exploiting Swiss bank accounts, and the U.S. government has failed to aggressively pursue Switzerland’s second-largest bank, a Senate investigation has found. The bank, Credit Suisse, has provided accounts in Switzerland for more than 22,000 U.S. clients totaling $10 billion to $12 billion, according to a report issued Tuesday by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. The U.S. government has received only 238 names of U.S. citizens with secret accounts at Credit Suisse, or just 1 percent of the estimated total, the investigation concluded.
- WSJ: – Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC announced a plan to cut around £5 billion ($8.3 billion) in costs over the next four years as the state-controlled bank posted its second-largest ever full-year net loss. The 81% state-owned lender reported a £9 billion net loss for 2013 on Thursday, compared with a £6.06 billion net loss the year before, hit by soaring impairments and restructuring charges. Revenue sagged 12% to £19.44 billion. Shares slumped 7.9% in afternoon trading.
Some shareholders (which include governments) are afraid to read the news – one just can’t tell where the next disastrous bank-related story will appear. This begs the question: are global bank regulators focused on the wrong things? Is the Dodd–Frank implementation – and similar international regulatory efforts – making the banking system any safer? Or are the banks and their management teams distracted with behemoth Volcker Rule and Basel III implementation projects instead of properly running their businesses?
From our sponsor:
Wall Street Examiner Disclosure: Lee Adler, The Wall Street Examiner reposts third party content with the permission of the publisher. The opinions expressed in these reposts are not those of the Wall Street Examiner or Lee Adler, unless authored by me, under my byline. I curate posts here on the basis of whether they represent an interesting and logical point of view, that may or may not agree with my own views. Some of the content includes the original publisher's promotional messages. No endorsement of such content is either expressed or implied by posting the content. All items published here are matters of information and opinion, and are neither intended as, nor should you construe it as, individual investment advice. Do your own due diligence when considering the offerings of information providers, or considering any investment.