Menu Close
Posted in Fast Facts, Money Morning

Don’t Believe the Headlines – Big Banks Are Still Screwing You- Shah Gilani

This is a syndicated repost courtesy of Money Morning. To view original, click here. Reposted with permission.

When it comes to big banks’ bad behavior and the fines they pay to settle “allegations” – which are actually civil charges and which would be criminal charges if applied to any other business or in any parallel universe – things aren’t even close to what they seem.

Sure the headlines scream victory, at least monetary victory, for some ripped-off consumers, some hard-charging regulators, and our vaunted (NOT) Justice Department.

We think we hear the ching-ching of the Treasury Department’s cash registers ringing as they collect billions of dollars from miscreant, monster banks.

We think we can hear victorious regulators popping champagne corks as they celebrate settlement money coming in to prop up their budgets so they can keep going after these lawbreakers.

We think we can hear the cling-clank of consumers – who’ve been set up like bowling pins to be knocked down until the change falls out of their pockets at the feet of slobbering banksters – getting some of their stolen money back.

If that is what you think you hear, you’re tone deaf.

Here’s what’s really going on…

Big Banks: What the Settlements Really Mean for Consumers

The headlines, like the ones that screamed JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE: JPM) was paying a record $13 billion to settle misdeeds that may have accidentally contributed to the credit crisis and the Great Recession that maybe forever imposed on America’s middle class and perennial underclass a new set of dream shackles, are BS. And I don’t mean back-stabbing.

Ripped-off consumers don’t get made whole. Regulators don’t keep a dime of what they extract. Only the U.S. Treasury rings its register on any regular basis… and you thought the deficit was declining on its own!

And the big banks? Not only aren’t they paying what the headlines trumpet, most of what they do pay, and far more disgustingly, a lot of what they say they are going to pay in restitution to consumers, they write off on their taxes!

That’s right, after they neither admit nor deny doing what they did, and settle on paying fines and other forms of remunerative compensation to prove they didn’t do anything wrong, they write most of those “expenses” off.

Of course those write-offs reduce their taxable income. So the public’s screwed again.

You didn’t know that? If not, don’t beat yourself up. Not a lot of people do.

But Congress does.

Some people in Congress actually want to do something about the games banks play with the settlements they negotiate with regulators, attorneys general, and the Justice Department.

But, of course, Congress being Congress, none of these “bills” have moved an inch.

Back on Oct. 30, 2013, after JPM’s $13 billion settlement made headlines, House Democrats Peter Welch (VT) and Luis Gutierrez (IL) introduced the “Stop Deducting Damages Act of 2013.”

The bill as intended:

…amends the Internal Revenue Code to: (1) deny a tax deduction for any amount paid or incurred for compensatory or punitive damages in connection with any judgment in, or settlement of, any action against a government; and (2) include in gross income any amount paid as insurance or otherwise due to liability for punitive damages.

Then on Nov. 5, 2013, Senators Jack Reed (D-RI) and Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) put forward their “Government Settlement Transparency and Reform Act.”

The bill as intended:

…amends the Internal Revenue Code to expand provisions relating to the non-deductibility of fines and penalties, to prohibit a tax deduction for any amount paid or incurred to any governmental entity relating to the violation of any law or the investigation or inquiry into a potential violation of law. Exempts from such prohibition: (1) restitution or amounts paid to come into compliance with any law that was violated or otherwise involved in the investigation or inquiry, (2) amounts paid pursuant to a court order in a suit in which the governmental entity was not a party, and (3) amounts paid or incurred as taxes due. Imposes new reporting requirements on governmental entities relating to amounts paid as fines or for restitution.

But neither of those “bills” came due.

Then on Jan. 8, 2014, Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Tom Coburn (R-OK) introduced to the Senate their “Truth in Settlements Act of 2014.”

Senator Warren explained the bill:

When government agencies reach settlements with companies that break the law, they should disclose the terms of those deals to the public. Anytime an agency decides that an enforcement action is needed, but it is not willing to go to court, that agency should be willing to disclose the key terms and conditions of the agreement. Increased transparency will shut down backroom deal-making and ensure that Congress, citizens and watchdog groups can hold regulatory agencies accountable for strong and effective enforcement that benefits the public interest.

Meanwhile, Senator Warren’s website tells us:

Under the Truth in Settlements Act, all written public statements that reference the dollar amounts of settlements will be required to include explanations of how those settlements are categorized for tax purposes and whether payments may be offset by “credits” for particular conduct. Companies that settle with enforcement agencies will be required to disclose in their Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings whether they have deducted any or all of the dollar amounts of their settlements from their taxes; and federal agencies will be required to post basic information about settlements and provide copies of those agreements on their websites. To address concerns about confidentiality, the Truth in Settlements Act also requires agencies to explain publicly why confidentiality is justified in any particular instance. The Act also directs agencies to disclose basic information about the number of settlements they deem confidential each year and directs the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to conduct a study of confidentiality procedures and to provide additional recommendations for increasing transparency. These and other provisions of the Truth in Settlements Act will increase the transparency of government settlements and permit greater public scrutiny.

Where are these bills?

They were all DOA, as in dead on arrival.

Don’t bother looking to see if they’ve made any progress. I’ll tell you now, if any of them ever happen it will probably be in February, because it will be a cold day in hell before any of the big banks’ profits are meaningfully haircut by any “law.”

You want to know more about how settlements work, how banks negotiate them, how headlines about big fines are misleading? Read Part III of my series on settlements in Money Morning.

But read it on an empty stomach, otherwise you might get sick.

By the way, did you see what I put together especially for you?

Click here. As you’ll see, I’m finally blowing the lid on the most lucrative trade on the planet.

This is very unique trade… one that has created some of the biggest gains in history. Guys like Paulson, Paul Tudor Jones, Templeton… they’ve made unbelievable amounts of money using this trade. George Soros used it to make a billion dollars – in a single day!

This strategy has been hidden from you because the folks on Wall Street don’t want you to know how to land huge gains trading some of world’s biggest Blue Chips – without have to actually buy the stock.

But today I’m changing all of that. Just go here and I’ll show you exactly how to trade this trade for exceptionally large returns. Anyone can do it.

The post Don’t Believe the Headlines – Big Banks Are Still Screwing You appeared first on Money Morning – Only the News You Can Profit From.

Wall Street Examiner Disclosure: Lee Adler, The Wall Street Examiner reposts third party content with the permission of the publisher. The opinions expressed in these reposts are not those of the Wall Street Examiner or Lee Adler, unless authored by me, under my byline. I curate posts here on the basis of whether they represent an interesting and logical point of view, that may or may not agree with my own views. Some of the content includes the original publisher's promotional messages. No endorsement of such content is either expressed or implied by posting the content. All items published here are matters of information and opinion, and are neither intended as, nor should you construe it as, individual investment advice. Do your own due diligence when considering the offerings of information providers, or considering any investment.

Related Posts

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.