Menu Close
Posted in Contributors- Economic and Financial, Other Guys, Taken Down

China’s GDP questioned; monetary conditions tighten once again – Sober Look

This is a syndicated repost courtesy of Sober Look. To view original, click here. Reposted with permission.

Markets were not impressed with China’s 7.7% annualized 4th quarter GDP, which came in better than expected.

Source: Investing.com

Most economists still anticipate further deceleration in China’s economic expansion in 2014.

Reuters: – China’s economy narrowly missed expectations for growth to hit 14-year lows in 2013, though some economists say a cooldown will be inevitable this year as officials and investors hunker down for difficult reforms.

The chance that the world’s second-largest economy may decelerate in coming months was underscored on Monday by data that showed growth in investment and factory output flagged in the final months of last year.

Waning momentum capped China’s annual economic growth at a six-month low of 7.7 percent in the October-December quarter, a slowdown some analysts say may deepen this year as China endures the short-term pain of revamping its growth model for the long-term good.

Moreover, some analysts are questioning the validity of China’s growth data.

ISI China Research: – … from what we have seen, we think it would be a mistake for investors to markedly revise their views on China’s economy on the basis of these new data.

So a few comments on the process, and what analysts have to work with from the NBS in monitoring China’s economy.

Beijing does not report its GDP data in a way that is consistent with the UN standards for the National Income and Product Accounts – the way data is reported in all of the world’s modern economies. A little more data will be provided in the next days, but not sufficient detail for anyone to form a well-reasoned judgment of whether the economy and its important components are doing better, about the same or worse.

Real GDP growth, as reported by Beijing has been, for the most recent 7 quarters, 7.6%, 7.4%, 7.9%, 7.7%, 7.5%, 7.8% and 7.7%. This is, in our view, hard-to-imagine stability since 2Q2012.

China does not report a level of Real GDP, ever. There are no historical data, and no contemporary values either.

There is no way to verify the consistency, or lack thereof, of China’s reported % y/y and % q/q growth rates. Frustrated by this opacity, and having found internal inconsistencies in these numbers (as opposed to data), we assign no weight to the % q/q numbers provided.

Complicating matters is the new wave of tightening in China’s monetary conditions. Once again short-term rates increased suddenly and the PBoC injected additional liquidity this morning (see story). Given how unpredictable the central bank has been in controlling the interbank rates, investors are clearly nervous.

The combination of slowing economic growth, unease with real estate and credit expansion (particularly shadow banking), stronger currency (hurting exports), lack of direction for the corporate sector (see post), and uncertain/volatile monetary stance is creating jitters in China’s equity markets. This morning the Shanghai Composite fell below 2000 again (the peak reached in 2008 was around 6000). The last time we were here was during the first PBoC-induced liquidity crunch last summer (see post).

Source: Investing.com

Many economists view China’s growth – or lack thereof – posing the greatest risk to near-term global expansion.

SoberLook.com

Wall Street Examiner Disclosure: Lee Adler, The Wall Street Examiner reposts third party content with the permission of the publisher. The opinions expressed in these reposts are not those of the Wall Street Examiner or Lee Adler, unless authored by me, under my byline. I curate posts here on the basis of whether they represent an interesting and logical point of view, that may or may not agree with my own views. Some of the content includes the original publisher's promotional messages. No endorsement of such content is either expressed or implied by posting the content. All items published here are matters of information and opinion, and are neither intended as, nor should you construe it as, individual investment advice. Do your own due diligence when considering the offerings of information providers, or considering any investment.

Related Posts

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.