Support the Wall Street Examiner! Choose your level of support to receive a free proprietary report as my thanks. Click the button below to see your options. Become a Patron!

Deposit growth ≠ loan growth – Sober Look

This is a syndicated repost courtesy of Sober Look. To view original, click here. Reposted with permission.

We’ve received a number of questions regarding the recent post on the trajectory of the US loan-to-deposit ratio (see post). Many are wondering how such fluctuations are even possible. That’s because the classic view in economics is that deposits are created only through loans. When a bank provides a loan, deposits are created as a result. So how is it that US deposits are growing, while loan growth has stalled?

The first part of the answer is that loans and leases represent just over half of banks’ total assets in the US. That’s very different from many smaller countries where lending may be a much bigger percentage of banks’ holdings. A US bank for example could provide financing in a form of a registered bond (financing for a municipality or a corporation), which would not show up in the loan-to-deposit ratio.
Source: FRB

But the biggest problem with the “loans=deposits” school of thought is the assumption that banks operate in a static monetary base environment. This assumes that banks in effect are the only lenders. But these days the Fed is the largest single lender in the US and that’s where a large portion of the deposit growth is coming from. The Fed is lending to the federal government and to the GSEs, which ends up generating deposits at commercial banks. Every dollar the Fed uses to buy securities outright ends up as a deposit at some bank(s). As the chart below shows, this is one of the situations that increases deposits without any loan growth at commercial banks. 

Through this process QE floods the banking system with deposits in hopes that all this liquidity (excess reserves) will spur banks to increase lending.  However, for a number of reasons – some of which has to do with low demand for credit – that approach is not working out as “planned”.

From our sponsor:

Wall Street Examiner Disclosure: Lee Adler, The Wall Street Examiner reposts third party content with the permission of the publisher. The opinions expressed in these reposts are not those of the Wall Street Examiner or Lee Adler, unless authored by me, under my byline. I curate posts here on the basis of whether they represent an interesting and logical point of view, that may or may not agree with my own views. Some of the content includes the original publisher's promotional messages. No endorsement of such content is either expressed or implied by posting the content. All items published here are matters of information and opinion, and are neither intended as, nor should you construe it as, individual investment advice. Do your own due diligence when considering the offerings of information providers, or considering any investment.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.