It now seems likely that the Obama Administration’s drive to obtain Congressional support for direct military action in Syria will fail in the House of Representatives. Here is what the latest count looks like based on the Washington Post’s analysis.
|Source: The Washington Post|
Among the undecided congressmen the key concern seems to be the support of the international community. And while the condemnation of Syria’s use of chemical weapons seems to be broad, only a handful of nations would potentially be willing to participate in the “coalition”. With the UK out of the picture, European politicians are unwilling to lose domestic votes by militarily supporting strikes against Syria.
The undecided group will therefore rely more on voter sentiment. And unlike in previous military engagements, the US voters are reluctant to support the President on this issue.
This group of congressmen is clearly also tracking voter support for the president in general and the associated risks of siding with the Obama administration on this. The vote is especially important to many in the House given the upcoming midterm elections. And the president’s approval ratings have been consistently declining lately. From a purely political perspective there is now more downside to voting “yes”. That meas we should see a sufficiently large portion of the undecided group voting against this proposal to reject US military action in Syria.
From our sponsor:
Wall Street Examiner Disclosure: Lee Adler, The Wall Street Examiner reposts third party content with the permission of the publisher. The opinions expressed in these reposts are not those of the Wall Street Examiner or Lee Adler, unless authored by me, under my byline. I curate posts here on the basis of whether they represent an interesting and logical point of view, that may or may not agree with my own views. Some of the content includes the original publisher's promotional messages. No endorsement of such content is either expressed or implied by posting the content. All items published here are matters of information and opinion, and are neither intended as, nor should you construe it as, individual investment advice. Do your own due diligence when considering the offerings of information providers, or considering any investment.