The opinions expressed are those of Money Morning and the author, not those of the Wall Street Examiner. The Wall Street Examiner makes no representation regarding the accuracy or validity of the ideas expressed in the post. No recommendation or endorsement is intended or implied. This post is presented for informational purposes as representative of one of a range of views on the subject. Do all necessary due diligence before considering any investment.
Setting aside the $2.13 trillion under management, there is a certain mystique attached to hedge funds and the people, like George Soros, Carl Icahn, and John Paulson, who manage them.
At one time, hedge fund managers were counted among the “Masters of the Universe.” Most of the “rich lists” include no small portion of these types.
But all of these big money managers ultimately live or die on performance.
If their fund takes a dive, the manager might not even draw a paycheck. Meanwhile, the wildly successful managers are compensated far and above what the average Wall Street or London über-banker receives.
But this year, the hedge funds have collectively lagged behind the S&P 500 by about 10% according to Goldman Sachs. Analysts there credit this underwhelming performance to overly bear-ish fund managers who like to short stocks like Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ), only to see the stocks head the other way.
Part of the allure of the hedge fund world is that they are usually open only to “accredited investors,” certain high net worth individuals who meet the criteria, laid out in SEC Regulation D, rules 505 and 506, for investing in hedge funds [emphasis added].
Here are just a few of the criteria:
- a bank, insurance company, registered investment company, business development company, or small business investment company;
- a director, executive officer, or general partner of the company selling the securities;
- a natural person who has individual net worth, or joint net worth with the person’s spouse, that exceeds $1 million at the time of the purchase, excluding the value of the primary residence of such person;
- a natural person with income exceeding $200,000 in each of the two most recent years or joint income with a spouse exceeding $300,000 for those years and a reasonable expectation of the same income level in the current year; or
- a trust with assets in excess of $5 million, not formed to acquire the securities offered, whose purchases a sophisticated person makes.
A Poor Man’s Hedge Fund
As for the rest of us, who may not be “accredited investors?” We’re on our own-but not completely.
There are certain ways to taste the rarified air of the hedge fund crowd.
There is an ETF, the Global X Guru Holdings Index ETF (NYSEArca:GURU). Global X’s methodology involves scouring the numerous 13F forms that fund managers are required to file. The fund searches for the best performing holdings among the hedge funds – the managers’ top picks – with the least turnover, and takes you along for the ride. It’s been called the “poor man’s hedge fund.”
GURU has been around a little less than a year, and has beaten the S&P 500 by a respectable 18 percent.
It’s not bad, but their track record is thin on time and the truth is there are ways to do even better…
A savvy investor, looking for very healthy returns, might eschew an ETF like GURU and take a look at… some real gurus instead. These model portfolios have a different approach than both the hedge funds and ETFs.
The guru, like our own Keith Fitz-Gerald or Dr. Kent Moors, for example, will target a security and then consider a myriad of factors like risk, suitability, market conditions or trends and then analyze all these things, distilling the information as a set of clear instructions.
And while hedge funds have collectively lagged behind the S&P500 by about 10% our own experts have beaten it soundly. In fact, in many cases, these gurus’ model portfolios have bagged gains far north of 20%.
Keith Fitz-Gerald’s Strike Forcemodel portfolio, for instance, is currently up an incredible 35.9% on the year- positively thrashing – no other word for it – the S&P 500’s 15.6%. Fitz-Gerald’s Money Map Reportmodel portfolio, based on the risk-balanced 50-40-10 allocation strategy, is also ahead of the S&P earning 23.71% gains on all of 2013’s open positions.
Dr. Kent Moors’ Energy Advantagemodel portfolio is up 33.21%, weighted as it is towards energy stocks of all kinds; master limited partnerships, midstream providers, and refiners. Energy Advantageis finding profits through the changing way that energy is bought and sold throughout the world.
When you consider the fairly steep fees charged by the various funds, and the outright inaccessibility of most hedge funds to the average investor, these guru services look downright cheap. The gurus won’t invest money for you. You’ll have to manage your own money, but the insights they can provide are invaluable.
And any guru worthy of the title would tell you that an informed, proactive investor will have the edge every time.
To learn more about the market beating returns offered by the Money Map Report click here. If the world of energy is more your speed you can check out Dr. Kent Moors’ Energy Advantage by clicking here.
Hedge Funds Trail S&P 500 by 10 Percentage Points, Goldman Says
- Securities and Exchange Commission:
- Money Morning:
Why the S&P 500 is Actually Nowhere Near an All-Time High
Getting To Know Hedge-Like Mutual Funds
Wall Street Examiner Disclosure: Lee Adler, The Wall Street Examiner reposts third party content with the permission of the publisher. The opinions expressed in these reposts are not those of the Wall Street Examiner or Lee Adler, unless authored by me, under my byline. I curate posts here on the basis of whether they represent an interesting and logical point of view, that may or may not agree with my own views. Some of the content includes the original publisher's promotional messages. No endorsement of such content is either expressed or implied by posting the content. All items published here are matters of information and opinion, and are neither intended as, nor should you construe it as, individual investment advice. Do your own due diligence when considering the offerings of information providers, or considering any investment.