A little girl named Carol Anne became famous for saying “They’re h-e-r-e” in the 1982 movie Poltergeist.
She was talking about the “TV people,” and they ended up being from way out of town.
Well, we have our equivalent digital denizens, and they’re also returning in force. Except ours are largely from the investment shadows, awaiting the next opportunity to brandish heavy fear tactics to convince you the energy market is about to collapse…again.
It makes me want to shout, “They’re b-a-a-c-k!”
It is enough to prompt a recall of that old saw about market analysts.
You know, the one that says they have correctly predicted eight of the last three recessions.
At issue this time is the latest financial obstacle the market must overcome: the sequestration scheduled to hit a week from today. Now the draconian cuts will occur automatically, although it will also take some time for them to have any impact.
Most will not result in anything significant for at least a month.
Of course, the markets are not going to wait that long. For the past two days, the first wave of nail biting started. It will get worse as our darling Congressmen return from their well-earned (satire here folks, satire) vacation to play politics instead of reaching an agreement.
After this, we will get back to business. We can ignore those talking heads for one major reason.
Leading Indicators Point North
Most of the signs, especially among the leading economic indicators, are now pointing in that direction.
That’s good news for us, since most of those indicators are energy sensitive. Well before the recovery arrives in the broader market, the energy sector is already advancing because of the front-loaded demand in a returning production, industrial and commercial process.
We need to get through the current waves of unrest and investment misgivings. But that will not be easy.
Congress does not come back into session until Monday and the sequestration is slated to take effect at close of business on Friday. That’s going to make for a long and vexing week.
First, there will be the recriminations and finger pointing. Then, there will be the pundits suggesting the severe cuts may not be a bad thing. Sure, they will derail a recovery, wreck havoc with military procurements, Medicare payments, Project Head Start, and every other government program, while throwing a large chunk of the working population back on the unemployment rolls.
On the other hand, these sages of the airwaves will declare that it will make the budget look better.
Now don’t get me wrong. There are massive problems in Washington on both the revenue and expenditure sides of the ledger. They have been developing over the years, and putting the brakes on them will be difficult and painful.
The simple observation, however, is this. Neither Congress nor the White House will allow the recovery to be sacrificed. After questioning each other’s parentage, some uneven and out of focus compromise will be reached.
We should not expect the underlying problem to be solved in short order. We just want the Washington children to go pout in the corner, get out of the way, and let us make some money.
This brings me back to the fear mongers.
Don’t Buy the Hype
You have probably heard the naysayers over the last few days claiming oil is about to go down to $50 a barrel. Just a month ago, many of these pundits were then saying crude would fall to $40, so it seems they are mellowing a bit.
Whenever events pressure oil down, these masters of misdirection are back to remind why you need to invest with them, or buy their analysis, or wish upon a star. However, they are wrong about this on a massive scale.
Yes, oil goes up and down.
Yes, matters outside the oil sector have an irritating habit of upsetting the dynamics of supply and demand.
Yes, sometimes energy moves down faster than the market as a whole.
Still, this is not the normal move, nor is it a strategy upon which to invest in any medium-term perspective. Our advisory poltergeists are right only if the markets are permanently in recession (or worse).
Remember, these folks have only three objectives.
First, they need you to buy into the inevitability of a collapse in oil, resulting in investors bailing out and a further decline in price, thereby allowing the doomsayers to continue making money. You see, those in this category have been shorting the market all along and will continue to benefit if oil is driven further down.
Or second, they have another direction in mind altogether. In this scenario, they are really pushing gold, grain, another commodity, or some other investment area altogether. They have no real expertise or genuine interest in energy. They see an opportunity to deflect investment flows and go with it.
Third, there are some who actually believe the world is about to end and we are all going to freeze this (or next) winter.
The first are deceptive, the second disingenuous, while the third are simply wrong.
I appreciate a good piece of horror fiction as much as anybody does. It’s just never an acceptable roadmap for investment.[Editor’s Note: A massive new oil discovery in Australia in now out of the bag. It’s called the Arckaringa Basin and it holds $20 Trillion worth of shale oil. The find is so big it potentially contains 233 billion barrels of oil. That’s more that all of the oil in Iran, Canada or Venezuela.
For investors, this could be a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. To learn more about the Arckaringa Basin click here]
Related Articles and Links:
- Money Morning: Buy Signal: Top Hedge Funds Are Moving Into Energy
- Money Morning: Betting on the Coming Boom in Natural Gas Prices
- Money Morning: Three Reasons Why the Energy “Experts” are Wrong
- Money Morning: Are the Russians on the Verge of a Major Arctic Oil Coup?
Tags: economic depression recovery, Economic Recovery, economic recovery 2012, economic recovery 2013, economic recovery comparison, economic recovery definition, economic recovery obama, economic recovery plan, economic recovery plan obama, economic stimulus, eu economic recovery plan, european economic recovery plan, making work pay plan, recovery and reinvestment
Wall Street Examiner Disclosure: Lee Adler, The Wall Street Examiner reposts third party content with the permission of the publisher. The opinions expressed in these reposts are not those of the Wall Street Examiner or Lee Adler, unless authored by me, under my byline. I curate posts here on the basis of whether they represent an interesting and logical point of view, that may or may not agree with my own views. Some of the content includes the original publisher's promotional messages. No endorsement of such content is either expressed or implied by posting the content. All items published here are matters of information and opinion, and are neither intended as, nor should you construe it as, individual investment advice. Do your own due diligence when considering the offerings of information providers, or considering any investment.