Support the Wall Street Examiner! Choose your level of support to receive a free proprietary report as my thanks. Click the button below to see your options. Become a Patron!

Beveridge curve using U-5 unemployment – Sober Look

This is a syndicated repost courtesy of Sober Look. To view original, click here. Reposted with permission.

Mike Konczal (@rortybomb) suggested plotting the Beveridge curve using U-5 unemployment instead of the standard unemployment rate (discussed here) or the employment to population ratio (discussed here). Below is the definition:

U-5 Unemployment Definition: – Total unemployed, plus discouraged workers, plus all other marginally attached workers, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus all marginally attached workers. Marginally attached workers are persons who currently are neither working nor looking for work but indicate that they want and are available for a job and have looked for work sometime in the recent past. Discouraged workers, a subset of the marginally attached, have given a job-market related reason for not currently looking for a job. Persons employed part time for economic reasons are those who want and are available for full-time work but have had to settle for a part-time schedule.

The post-recession U5 curve has more slope to it than the employment population ratio. That means the labor markets are responding to new job openings to a great extent by adding “marginally attached” workers. But even with this result, projecting post-recession trend to pre-recession high in job openings rate of 3.3% will result in U-5 of around 9%. The recent pre-recession low U-5 on the other hand was some 5.5%. That’s a 3.5% increase in the “natural” U-5 unemployment rate (if such a thing could be defined). This is clearly a structural shift – no matter how one slices it.

SoberLook.com

Wall Street Examiner Disclosure: Lee Adler, The Wall Street Examiner reposts third party content with the permission of the publisher. The opinions expressed in these reposts are not those of the Wall Street Examiner or Lee Adler, unless authored by me, under my byline. I curate posts here on the basis of whether they represent an interesting and logical point of view, that may or may not agree with my own views. Some of the content includes the original publisher's promotional messages. No endorsement of such content is either expressed or implied by posting the content. All items published here are matters of information and opinion, and are neither intended as, nor should you construe it as, individual investment advice. Do your own due diligence when considering the offerings of information providers, or considering any investment.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.