<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Wall Street Examiner &#187; Last Resort</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wallstreetexaminer.com/tag/last-resort/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wallstreetexaminer.com</link>
	<description>Be prepared. Stay ahead of the herd.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 20:09:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Ultimate Preparation Guide for today&#8217;s Fed Announcement</title>
		<link>http://forums.wallstreetexaminer.com/topic/1001162-the-ultimate-preparation-guide-for-todays-fed-announcement/</link>
		<comments>http://forums.wallstreetexaminer.com/topic/1001162-the-ultimate-preparation-guide-for-todays-fed-announcement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bears Chat at The Wall Street Examiner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bears Chat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best of the Forums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bear Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bulls And Bears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal Matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fomc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Last Resort]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forums.wallstreetexaminer.com/topic/1001162-the-ultimate-preparation-guide-for-todays-fed-announcement/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today concludes a two-day meeting of the FOMC, after which Ben Bernanke  is expected to unveil his latest trick for stimulating the conomy.  See, because the recovery is faltering, and because Congress is fighting  with the President on fiscal matters,...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Today concludes a two-day meeting of the FOMC, after which <a href='http://www.businessinsider.com/blackboard/ben-bernanke' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'>Ben Bernanke</a>  is expected to unveil his latest trick for stimulating the conomy.  See, because the recovery is faltering, and because Congress is fighting  with the President on fiscal matters, there's no choice but for the Fed  to be the stimulator of last resort. <br />
<br />
So what will the Fed do?<br />
<br />
Read more: <a href='http://www.businessinsider.com/preview-of-the-fed-meeting-and-operation-twist-2011-9#ixzz1YbLfXVzn' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'>http://www.businessi...9#ixzz1YbLfXVzn</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wallstreetexaminer.com/2011/09/21/the-ultimate-preparation-guide-for-todays-fed-announcement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Sovereign-Debt-Default Survival Kit: The Four Countries That Will Keep Their AAA Ratings</title>
		<link>http://wallstreetexaminer.com/2011/07/19/a-sovereign-debt-default-survival-kit-the-four-countries-that-will-keep-their-aaa-ratings/</link>
		<comments>http://wallstreetexaminer.com/2011/07/19/a-sovereign-debt-default-survival-kit-the-four-countries-that-will-keep-their-aaa-ratings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 10:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Hutchinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Money Morning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aaa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aaa Credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attack On Pearl Harbor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cold Rain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Rating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt Ceiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt Default]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Downgrades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Wife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gdp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government bonds rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government savings bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Last Resort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luxuriant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazine Promotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safe Haven]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safe haven investments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safe haven stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[savings bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sovereign bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sovereign Credit Ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sovereign Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sovereign Debt Default]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sovereign debt definition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sovereign debt funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sovereign debt rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sovereign debt ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sovereign wealth funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standard And Poor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Survival Guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Survival Kit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urgent Question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weekend Vacation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wildlife Watchers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymorning.com/?p=52716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stories about debt downgrades and sovereign-debt defaults  are dominating the headlines.<br /><br />
And it's no longer just Europe that we have to be worried  about. On Friday, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.google.com/finance?cid=4907797">Standard  and Poor's</a> warned that there <a target="_blank" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/07/15/us-sp-us-idUSTRE76E01S20110715">was  a 50-50 chance that the United States would lose its AAA debt rating</a> in the  next 90 days - even if the debt ceiling didn't result in a U.S. default.<br /><br />
When you get right down to it, we're all asking the same  urgent question: Just where the hell can I go for a really safe investment?<br /><br />
Fortunately, I have an answer for you.<br /><br />
<h3>The  Sovereign-Debt-Default Survival Guide</h3>
S&#038;P put us on notice back in April,  when the ratings agency affirmed the country's AAA/A-1+ sovereign credit  ratings - but also <a target="_blank" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/apr/18/us-economy-credit-rating">cut  its outlook on the United States' long-term debt rating from "stable" to  "negative."</a> The last time that happened to the United States was 70 years ago - right after the attack on Pearl  Harbor.

What S&#038;P is talking about now, though,  is a reduction of the country's actual credit rating. For years, investors  throughout the world have viewed U.S. government debt as the "safe haven" of  last resort.
<br /><br />
With a cut in the country's credit rating, those days would  be over.<br /><br />
If you're searching for alternatives to U.S. debt, the good  news is that Standard &#038; Poor's has granted 18  other countries that top AAA credit rating. The bad news is that the selection  isn't as luxuriant as it first appears.<br /><br />
It's important to separate the  prospects from the suspects.<br /><br />
<strong><em><a href="http://moneymorning.com/2011/07/19/sovereign-debt-default-survival-kit-four-countries-will-keep-aaa-ratings/" target="_blank">To continue reading, please click here ...</a></em></strong><br />
  <br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
					<div id="cfct-build-52716" class="cfct-build">
						
				<div id="cfct-row-1bb2e9cbecdc7ba386108345e49c40d9" class="cfct-row cfct-row-a">
					<div class="cfct-row-inner"><div id="cfct-block-277fad22f09885f6d64dc870ecea2dce" class="cfct-block block-0 cfct-block-abc">
			<div class="cfct-module cfct-html ">
				Stories about debt downgrades and sovereign-debt defaults  are dominating the headlines.<br /><br />
And it's no longer just Europe that we have to be worried  about. On Friday, <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?cid=4907797">Standard  and Poor's</a> warned that there <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/07/15/us-sp-us-idUSTRE76E01S20110715">was  a 50-50 chance that the United States would lose its AAA debt rating</a> in the  next 90 days - even if the debt ceiling didn't result in a U.S. default.<br /><br />
When you get right down to it, we're all asking the same  urgent question: Just where the hell can I go for a really safe investment?<br /><br />
Fortunately, I have an answer for you.<br /><br />
<h3>The  Sovereign-Debt-Default Survival Guide</h3>
S&amp;P put us on notice back in April,  when the ratings agency affirmed the country's AAA/A-1+ sovereign credit  ratings - but also <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/apr/18/us-economy-credit-rating">cut  its outlook on the United States' long-term debt rating from "stable" to  "negative."</a> The last time that happened to the United States was 70 years ago - right after the attack on Pearl  Harbor.

What S&amp;P is talking about now, though,  is a reduction of the country's actual credit rating. For years, investors  throughout the world have viewed U.S. government debt as the "safe haven" of  last resort.
<br /><br />
With a cut in the country's credit rating, those days would  be over.<br /><br />
If you're searching for alternatives to U.S. debt, the good  news is that Standard &amp; Poor's has granted 18  other countries that top AAA credit rating. The bad news is that the selection  isn't as luxuriant as it first appears.<br /><br />
It's important to separate the  prospects from the suspects.<br /><br />
			</div>
			</div></div>
				</div>
				
				<div id="cfct-row-af8072c0e13a39beb1afc24508c29330" class="cfct-row cfct-row-a">
					<div class="cfct-row-inner"><div id="cfct-block-5f11337528ad76e80b4d51e97c414da0" class="cfct-block block-0 cfct-block-abc">
			<div class="cfct-module mm-toolbar-module ">
				
			</div>
			</div></div>
				</div>
				<div id="cfct-row-d0d5ab575cd260343a6e82560d18fce5" class="cfct-row cfct-row-float-b"><div id="cfct-block-deff309c77b063430dab1750ede658e6" class="cfct-block-float-c">
			<div class="cfct-module cfct-widget-module- ">
				
			</div>
			</div><div id="cfct-block-838c7deb62aeba9b77e23e994ec23bc3" class="cfct-block-float-ab">
			<div class="cfct-module cfct-html ">
				For example, S&P granted the <strong><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isle_of_Man">Isle of Man</a></strong> that top  AAA rating. Unlike many folks, I have actually been to the Isle of Man - my  first wife won a weekend vacation there in a magazine promotion. Although it's  a lovely spot and <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/naturescalendar/winter/islands/isle_man/isle_man.shtml">affords  wildlife watchers</a> lots of interesting opportunities, I can report that the  cold, rain-swept resort has very little economy - other than a casino full of  Liverpool grannies with accents incomprehensible to an outsider. <br /><br />
Casinos are supposed to be highly  lucrative, but when you think of the Isle of Man casino, don't think of <a href="http://moneymorning.com/2011/06/23/the-new-global-gambling-hotspot-thats-set-to-overtake-las-vegas/">Macao  or Las Vegas</a>. Picture instead the lonely Indian reservation casino in  remote Salamanca, NY - host to the occasional half-empty tour bus from <a href="http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/181501/20110716/mlb-pittsburgh-pirates-first-place-nl-central-1992-barry-bonds.htm">Pittsburgh</a>.  The Isle of Man has a population of 80,000 - which is much larger than I would  have guessed. It also has the world's oldest continuously existing parliament,  the Tynwald - which was established way back in 979 AD.<br /><br />
But I still don't think that I'd  buy its bonds.

<h3>A Global  Sovereign-Debt Excursion</h3>
Given the lesson we've learned from our close look at the  Isle of Man, I think it's worth taking a quick sovereign-debt safari. This is  one trip around the world that won't cost you a dime. Indeed, in an era of  spiraling fears about sovereign-debt defaults, it should actually bolster your  bottom line.<br /><br />
Let's take a spin through the list of Standard & Poor's  AAA-rated countries - in alphabetical order: <br /><br />
<ul type="disc">
  <li><strong>Australia</strong> and <strong>Austria </strong>have little in common other than their AAA debt       ratings. Of the two, I'd trust Australia rather more because of its       mineral wealth. However, it has quite high debt and a tendency towards       populist governments. Austria has a huge welfare state and a       somewhat-shaky economy that's dependent on financial services. I don't see       either going bust, but neither would be my first choice. </li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
  <li><strong>Canada </strong>is a pretty solid outfit in my view, and <a href="http://moneymorning.com/2011/04/12/canada-investing-worlds-safest-economy-can-put-profits-your-pocket/">one       of the world's safest economies</a> - something we've told all of you <strong><em>Money       Morning</em></strong> readers on several previous occasions. The fact that       Canada got itself into trouble in the early 1990s has proved to be a       blessing; it has reduced government spending since then - to the point       that, overall, it's slightly lower than in the United States. I'll grant       you that Canada has a reputation for being boring. But as you know, for       bond investors, boring is good! </li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
  <li><strong>Denmark and Finland </strong>would be pretty solid if they were       standing on their own. Unfortunately, they are part of the euro community,       which means they could get sucked into appallingly expensive       bailout schemes. And unlike their German compatriot, Denmark and Finland       aren't big enough to say "no." </li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
  <li><strong>France </strong>is struggling with big budget deficits<strong>. </strong>Although there's no       "F" in PIIGS (the acronym of dodgy southern European economies       consisting of Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece and Spain), there probably       ought to be. </li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
  <li><strong>Germany</strong> is <a href="http://moneymorning.com/2011/01/20/investing-in-germany-the-closed-end-fund-to-buy-now/">the       single-most solid economy in the European Union (EU)</a>, and boasts a       large export surplus. On its own, Germany is a slam-dunk AAA economy. Even       as a euro member, it seems unlikely the EU can do anything too ruinous       without Germany signing on, because it would have to pay most of the cost.       In my bottom-line view, that means Germany's top-tier credit rating is       likely to remain solid. </li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
  <li><strong>Guernsey</strong> is an offshore British       island and popular tax haven. Its population only totals 66,000, but it       has a good offshore-banking       business. And being further south, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guernsey">Guernsey</a> also features       better weather than its Isle of       Man counterpart. </li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
  <li><strong>Hong Kong </strong>currently faces a situation in which its government spending is       rising faster than <a href="http://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/199.asp">gross domestic       product</a> (GDP).<strong> </strong>As it       is now part of China, I would also have to say that it now faces a fairly       substantial political risk. </li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
  <li><strong>Liechtenstein and Luxembourg </strong>have vastly different outlooks.<strong> </strong>Of the two,<strong> </strong>Liechtenstein's       the one you want, due to its hereditary Hapsburg monarchy, flourishing       tax-haven banking industry and truly lovely Alpine scenery. Unfortunately,       its population at 35,000 is even smaller than that of Guernsey. Luxembourg       is an EU banking center that has the misfortune to be technically the EU's       richest country. Suckers! </li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
  <li><strong>The Netherlands</strong> offers investors       pretty much the same mix of advantages and disadvantages as Denmark and       Finland except that it isn't <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scandinavia">Scandinavian</a>. Expect,       therefore, a substantial EU/Eurozone discount. </li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
  <li><strong>Norway </strong>isn't an EU member, so nobody can make it bail out Greece. <u>Now</u> you're talking! Plus, it's a major oil exporter, with <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/5f1e4ace-958d-11e0-8f82-00144feab49a.html#axzz1SUX5lU6O">a       huge ($570 billion), well-managed sovereign wealth fund</a>. If you can       find any <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norway">Kingdom of Norway</a> debt, buy it! </li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
  <li><strong>Singapore </strong>is the country I would regard as the most solid economy of the       S&P AAA-credit-rating club, chiefly<strong> </strong>because it has a more diverse economy than Norway. Singapore       is beautifully run, and one of the least-corrupt countries in the world.       In short: It's rock solid. </li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
  <li><strong>Sweden, </strong>unlike its Norway counterpart,<strong> </strong>doesn't have<strong> </strong>much oil and has no trust. It       also has a heavy social welfare system and an expensive government. On the       plus side, it had the sense to stay out of the euro. </li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
  <li><strong>Switzerland</strong> is basically a Norway       - but with banks instead of oil. It, too, is rock solid. </li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
  <li><strong>The United Kingdom</strong> is no longer an       empire, and has no money these days. There's not much industry left, which       leaves it very heavily dependent on a bunch of dodgy hedge funds in the       City of London. Unlike the United States, the United Kingdom has made at       least some attempt to get its public spending under control. And while I       would say it's pretty likely to follow its U.S. counterpart into a       credit-rating downgrade, if I were S&P, I'd downgrade France before       either of these two. </li>
</ul>
So there you have it. As I warned, there's not all that  much to choose from - although the choice selections (Canada, Norway, Switzerland  and Singapore) all look pretty solid.<br /><br />
As you assemble your safe-haven investments, keep in mind a  couple of Asian countries that aren't AAA-rated, but also aren't overly  indebted. And they're run by grownups. I'm talking about Taiwan (AA-minus) and  South Korea (A).<br /><br />
At a juncture in which sovereign-debt defaults are a very  real possibility, it's clear bond safety isn't what it used to be. <br /><br />
<div class="green-screen"><strong>[<u>Bio Note</u>: If you're an income investor, the  financial markets can be a downright frightening place right now.</strong><br /><br />
<strong>Stocks are too volatile, dependable high dividend yields  are as rare as hen's teeth, and U.S. Treasury yields are anemic (not to mention  the associated growing risk of a cut in the U.S. credit rating).</strong><br /><br />
<strong>Most investors are watching as the threat of sovereign  debt defaults around the world gut their portfolios. Others have retreated to  the sidelines.</strong><br /><br />
<strong>But <em>Money Morning</em>'s Martin Hutchinson has  developed a strategy that combines safety <em>and</em> profits - and that will  enable you turn these "negatives" to your advantage. <a href="http://moneymorning.com/video/pbi/pbi_math895.php?code=WPBIM302">Click  here</a> to learn how you, too, can use these techniques to build a lifetime of  wealth, safety and security.]</strong></div><br /><br />
<strong><u>News  and Related Story Links</u></strong>:<br /><br />
<ul type="disc">
<li><strong>The  Permanent Wealth Investor:</strong> <a href="http://moneymorning.com/video/pbi/pbi_math895.php?code=WPBIM302"><br />
  Official  Website</a>.</li>
<li><strong>Reuters:</strong> <br />
  <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/07/15/us-sp-us-idUSTRE76E01S20110715">S&P  warns of downgrade if no debt deal reached</a>.</li>
  <li><strong>The       Guardian</strong>: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/apr/18/us-economy-credit-rating"><br />
  Wall       Street shares slump as S&P downgrades US debt outlook</a>.</li>
  <li><strong>Money       Morning: </strong><a href="http://moneymorning.com/2011/04/12/canada-investing-worlds-safest-economy-can-put-profits-your-pocket/" title="Permanent link to Canada: Investing in the World's Safest Economy Can Put Profits in Your Pocket"><br />
  Canada:       Investing in the World's Safest Economy Can Put Profits in Your Pocket</a>.</li>
  <li><strong>Wikipedia</strong>: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isle_of_Man"><br />
  The Isle of Man</a>.</li>
  <li><strong>The       BBC</strong>: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/naturescalendar/winter/islands/isle_man/isle_man.shtml"><br />
  The       Isle of Man - an Island Oasis</a>.</li>
  <li><strong>Money       Morning:</strong> <a href="http://moneymorning.com/2011/06/23/the-new-global-gambling-hotspot-thats-set-to-overtake-las-vegas/" title="Permanent link to The New Global Gambling Hotspot That's Set to Overtake Las Vegas"><br />
  The       New Global Gambling Hotspot That's Set to Overtake Las Vegas</a>.</li>
  <li><strong>International       Business Times</strong>: <a href="http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/181501/20110716/mlb-pittsburgh-pirates-first-place-nl-central-1992-barry-bonds.htm"><br />
  You       Are Not Mistaken: The Pittsburgh Pirates are in First Place</a>.</li>
  <li><strong>Money       Morning</strong>: <br />
  <a href="http://moneymorning.com/2011/01/20/investing-in-germany-the-closed-end-fund-to-buy-now/" title="Permanent link to Investing in Germany: The Closed-End Fund to Buy Now">Investing       in Germany: The Closed-End Fund to Buy Now</a>.</li>
  <li><strong>Wikipedia</strong>: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guernsey"><br />
  Guernsey</a>.</li>
  <li><strong>Investopedia</strong>: <br />
  <a href="http://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/199.asp">Gross Domestic       Product (GDP)</a>.</li>
  <li><strong>Wikipedia</strong>: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scandinavia"><br />
  Scandinavia</a>.</li>
  <li><strong>The       Financial Times: <br />
  </strong><a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/5f1e4ace-958d-11e0-8f82-00144feab49a.html#axzz1SUX5lU6O">Norway's       Sovereign Wealth Fund Optimistic on Europe</a>.</li>
  <li><strong>Wikipedia</strong>: <br />
  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norway">Norway</a>.</li>
</ul>
<br /><br />

			</div>
			</div></div>
					</div>
					
	<br /> <strong>Tags: </strong><a href="http://moneymorning.com/tag/aaa/" title="AAA" rel="tag">AAA</a>, <a href="http://moneymorning.com/tag/corporate-bonds/" title="Corporate Bonds" rel="tag">Corporate Bonds</a>, <a href="http://moneymorning.com/tag/credit-rating/" title="Credit Rating" rel="tag">Credit Rating</a>, <a href="http://moneymorning.com/tag/government-bonds/" title="government bonds" rel="tag">government bonds</a>, <a href="http://moneymorning.com/tag/government-bonds-rates/" title="government bonds rates" rel="tag">government bonds rates</a>, <a href="http://moneymorning.com/tag/government-savings-bonds/" title="government savings bonds" rel="tag">government savings bonds</a>, <a href="http://moneymorning.com/tag/safe-haven-investments/" title="safe haven investments" rel="tag">safe haven investments</a>, <a href="http://moneymorning.com/tag/safe-haven-stocks/" title="safe haven stocks" rel="tag">safe haven stocks</a>, <a href="http://moneymorning.com/tag/savings-bonds/" title="savings bonds" rel="tag">savings bonds</a>, <a href="http://moneymorning.com/tag/sovereign-bankruptcy/" title="sovereign bankruptcy" rel="tag">sovereign bankruptcy</a>, <a href="http://moneymorning.com/tag/sovereign-debt-default/" title="Sovereign Debt Default" rel="tag">Sovereign Debt Default</a>, <a href="http://moneymorning.com/tag/sovereign-debt-definition/" title="sovereign debt definition" rel="tag">sovereign debt definition</a>, <a href="http://moneymorning.com/tag/sovereign-debt-funds/" title="sovereign debt funds" rel="tag">sovereign debt funds</a>, <a href="http://moneymorning.com/tag/sovereign-debt-rankings/" title="sovereign debt rankings" rel="tag">sovereign debt rankings</a>, <a href="http://moneymorning.com/tag/sovereign-debt-ratings/" title="sovereign debt ratings" rel="tag">sovereign debt ratings</a>, <a href="http://moneymorning.com/tag/sovereign-wealth-funds/" title="sovereign wealth funds" rel="tag">sovereign wealth funds</a><br />
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/USMoneyMorning?a=BBi81Dd0i2Q:1624wqsiYAw:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/USMoneyMorning?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/USMoneyMorning?a=BBi81Dd0i2Q:1624wqsiYAw:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/USMoneyMorning?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/USMoneyMorning?a=BBi81Dd0i2Q:1624wqsiYAw:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/USMoneyMorning?i=BBi81Dd0i2Q:1624wqsiYAw:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/USMoneyMorning?a=BBi81Dd0i2Q:1624wqsiYAw:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/USMoneyMorning?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/USMoneyMorning?a=BBi81Dd0i2Q:1624wqsiYAw:l6gmwiTKsz0"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/USMoneyMorning?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/USMoneyMorning?a=BBi81Dd0i2Q:1624wqsiYAw:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/USMoneyMorning?i=BBi81Dd0i2Q:1624wqsiYAw:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/USMoneyMorning?a=BBi81Dd0i2Q:1624wqsiYAw:TzevzKxY174"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/USMoneyMorning?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"/></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/USMoneyMorning/~4/BBi81Dd0i2Q" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wallstreetexaminer.com/2011/07/19/a-sovereign-debt-default-survival-kit-the-four-countries-that-will-keep-their-aaa-ratings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obie Drinks the Kool Aid, What Would Shakespeare Say?</title>
		<link>http://wallstreetexaminer.com/2009/01/08/obie-drinks-the-kool-aid-what-would-shakespeare-say/</link>
		<comments>http://wallstreetexaminer.com/2009/01/08/obie-drinks-the-kool-aid-what-would-shakespeare-say/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 01:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lee Adler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Today's Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Dick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bigshots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Poole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contrary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conventional Wisdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Ceos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fat Cat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financiers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenspan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kool Aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Last Resort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maestro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mainstream]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multitude]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ponzi Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shakespeare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxpayers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trickle Up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Taxpayer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wallstreetexaminer.com/?p=3746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like Obie, but he has drunk the Kool Aid. We are doomed. He&#8217;s listening to the advice of those very same world renowned egonomists who never saw the current mess coming. How could those who never saw it coming in the first place, and didn&#8217;t recognize it after it had already begun have any clue how to get us out of this mess? It makes no sense. But Obie is obviously listening to them. So we are doomed. Doomed, I say. What&#8217;s my advice? After all, I was one of those non-economist types&#8211;called bears&#8211; and we are multitude&#8211;who did see this coming. People like Bill Outada Poole, Big Dick Cheney and others say that nobody saw this coming. Well, the government bigshots and mainstream egonomists didn&#8217;t see it because they were the problem. It was their system. Greenspan built it and he was their maestro. Those of us malcontents on the outside looking in&#8211;we saw it and we screamed and yelled and ranted and raved, but nobody on the inside wanted to hear it. They were having too much fun sucking on the teat of the Ponzi scheme they had created. But that&#8217;s for another time. The question is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Obie+Drinks+the+Kool+Aid%2C+What+Would+Shakespeare+Say%3F+http%3A%2F%2Fis.gd%2FHcBfzm" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://wallstreetexaminer.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter-micro3.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a></p></div><p>I like Obie, but he has drunk the Kool Aid. We are doomed. He&#8217;s listening to the advice of those very same world renowned egonomists who never saw the current mess coming. How could those who never saw it coming in the first place, and didn&#8217;t recognize it after it had already begun have any clue how to get us out of this mess? It makes no sense. But Obie is obviously listening to them. So we are doomed. </p>
<p>Doomed, I say. </p>
<p><span id="more-3746"></span><br />
What&#8217;s my advice? After all, I was one of those non-economist types&#8211;called bears&#8211; and we are multitude&#8211;who did see this coming. People like Bill Outada Poole, Big Dick Cheney and others say that nobody saw this coming. Well, the government bigshots and mainstream egonomists didn&#8217;t see it because they were the problem. It was their system. Greenspan built it and he was their maestro. Those of us malcontents on the outside looking in&#8211;we saw it and we screamed and yelled and ranted and raved, but nobody on the inside wanted to hear it. They were having too much fun sucking on the teat of the Ponzi scheme they had created. </p>
<p>But that&#8217;s for another time. The question is what I think &#8220;they&#8221; should do now. </p>
<p>Nothing. Because contrary to their conventional wisdom, doing nothing is actually much more likely to help the situation than following the advice of those who caused the problem. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s right, nothing. Oh, we definitely should have a little trickle up economics&#8211;some programs to allow the unemployed to subsist. We need to spend a lot less money on guns and more on butter for sure. And I guess we&#8217;ll have to raise the age for Social Security to 70, and roll back government fat cat pensions. </p>
<p>As for bailing out the bankers and brokers and corporate CEOs and all the friends of the politicians, I say let &#8216;em fail. Too late, I know. Bailing out the rich bankers and brokers will not save the system, it only puts the US taxpayer, instead of the investors who assumed the risk in the first place, in the position of bagholder of last resort. Why should we be the victims just to bail out the irresponsible self aggrandizing bankers, financiers, and  economists, the thieving corporate CEOs and CFOs, and the lazy, irresponsible, and crooked investment managers who caused this mess? These spending programs are burdening US from now till kingdom come with a problem that those people caused. Yet we are bailing THEM out. WHY? Because they have the power. We don&#8217;t. </p>
<p>Take for instance Senator Scummer thanking Citibank today for throwing its support behind the bankruptcy proposal to allow judges to force mortgages to be crammed down. What the hell does Citicorp have to do with the legislative process? Why should the Congress need that company&#8217;s support to pass any legislation? Why are OUR representatives THANKING THE CRIMINALS? Whatever happened to government of the people? The extent to which the corporations have taken over this government is shocking. The politicians don&#8217;t even pretend any more. They thank their corporate bosses publicly for giving the OK to legislation. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s an outrage. </p>
<p>OK, just another outrage. After a while you get numb to it. That&#8217;s how they get you to play the game and turn over the fruits of your labor. They slowly and surely wear you down and numb you to the pain. Orwell wrote the manual 60 some years ago. Did he suspect, did he know, that he was predicting the future of the United States of America? </p>
<p>They&#8217;ve already done this business of borrow and bail twice and the result is as obvious as the finger up your nose. Just look at what happened to the markets the previous two times where the federales engaged in massive public borrowing over a short period of time, last May and last October. The outcome will be no different this time. </p>
<p>The borrowing for &#8220;The Stimpack&#8221; as currently envisioned will crush the stock market and destroy whatever is left of confidence world wide. It will cause an even greater crisis by potentially destroying the world&#8217;s perception of the creditworthiness of the US Gummit itself. We will ultimately be at the mercy of our creditors, and they at ours. </p>
<p>Unless they scale this Stimpack thing down to next to nothing, or by some other miracle they don&#8217;t try to raise the money, we are doomed. I think our best hope is that when they begin to implement this monster and things start to go over the cliff they will, like Wily Coyote, somehow grab a branch, pull themselves back up, reverse course, and stop all the damn borrowing. </p>
<p>As so many bears have pointed out, we cannot cure the disease by giving the patient more of the same poison that caused it in the first place. </p>
<p>Furthermore, substituting the US Gummit in the sick bed of the financial system as the dying patient of last resort is the height of folly and irresponsibility. We will now all pay the price, doomed to a pitiful, sickly existence for generations to come. </p>
<p>If Shakespeare lived today, he would not have suggested that they should &#8220;kill all the lawyers&#8221; because he would have had economists as his foils instead. </p>
<p>Polonius&#8217;s advice would still hold, however. </p>
<p>Neither borrower nor lender be. </p>
<p>________________________________________</p>
<p><em>Try the Professional Edition risk free for thirty days. If, within that time, you don&#8217;t find the information useful, I will give you a full refund. It&#8217;s that simple.  <a href="http://wallstreetexaminer.com/?page_id=19">Click here for more information.</a></em></p>
<p><strong>BEAT THE JANUARY 15 PRICE INCREASE! </strong> Subscribe now and <a href="http://wallstreetexaminer.com/?page_id=19">lock in the current low rates</a>. Due to the increased complexity and critical importance of following the Fed, Treasury, and FCB actions as they impact US markets, and the additional time required to produce the Fed Report, the price of the Money, Liquidity, and Real Estate package will be increased as of January 15. This increase will NOT affect existing subscribers, and those who subscribe NOW! Be prepared! Stay ahead of the herd. Follow the Fed and friends in the Wall Street Examiner Professional Edition Fed Report in the Money, Liqidity, and Real Estate service package. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wallstreetexaminer.com/2009/01/08/obie-drinks-the-kool-aid-what-would-shakespeare-say/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hey! Where&#8217;s My $10 Billion! Professional Edition Fed Report</title>
		<link>http://wallstreetexaminer.com/2008/12/02/hey-wheres-my-10-billion-professional-edition-fed-report/</link>
		<comments>http://wallstreetexaminer.com/2008/12/02/hey-wheres-my-10-billion-professional-edition-fed-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 03:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lee Adler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Today's Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Taxpayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Balance Sheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Custodial Accounts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equity Investments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fcbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frizz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interesting Tidbits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Last Resort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monetize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Securities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professional Edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Split Ends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subsidy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thirty Days]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toothed Comb]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wallstreetexaminer.com/?p=3483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That question arose from the fact that that amount disappeared from the Fed’s balance sheet last week in the line items covering loans to and equity investments in the broken AIG. The Fed’s balance sheet as it pertains to custodial accounts for FCBs also makes clear why the Fed was forced to announce yesterday that it would begin acquiring $100 billion of GSE paper and $500 billion of MBS directly. FCBs forced the Fed’s hand by pulling out of the mortgage securities market over the past 2 months. The end of 4 years of subsidy brought about the collapse of that market, just as predicted here in these pages. That left the Fed no choice but to step in on behalf of the American taxpayer and other future victims, as the bagholders of last resort. There were many more interesting tidbits to be gleaned as I went through the Fed’s balance sheet with a fine toothed comb. There were lots of tangles, split ends and frizz, but there were a few strands that stood out. One of which is that the Fed still does not appear to be monetizing to any significant extent. The question that remains to be answered [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Hey%21+Where%E2%80%99s+My+%2410+Billion%21+Professional+Edition+Fed+Report+http%3A%2F%2Fis.gd%2FtWIrmQ" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://wallstreetexaminer.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter-micro3.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a></p></div><p>That question arose from the fact that that amount disappeared from the Fed’s balance sheet last week in the line items covering loans to and equity investments in the broken AIG. The Fed’s balance sheet as it pertains to custodial accounts for FCBs also makes clear why the Fed was forced to announce yesterday that it would begin acquiring $100 billion of GSE paper and $500 billion of MBS directly. FCBs forced the Fed’s hand by pulling out of the mortgage securities market over the past 2 months. The end of 4 years of subsidy brought about the collapse of that market, just as predicted here in these pages. That left the Fed no choice but to step in on behalf of the American taxpayer and other future victims, as the bagholders of last resort. </p>
<p>There were many more interesting tidbits to be gleaned as I went through the Fed’s balance sheet with a fine toothed comb. There were lots of tangles, split ends and frizz, but there were a few strands that stood out. One of which is that the Fed still does not appear to be monetizing to any significant extent. The question that remains to be answered is how they are going to fund the coming $600 billion balance sheet expansion in mortgage securities. Monetize, or otherwise?   <a href="http://wallstreetexaminer.com/money/fed120208.pdf">Click here to download complete report in pdf format (Professional Edition Subscribers).</a> <em>Try the Professional Edition risk free for thirty days. If, within that time, you don&#8217;t find the information useful, I will give you a full refund. It&#8217;s that simple.  <a href="http://wallstreetexaminer.com/?page_id=19">Click here for more information.</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wallstreetexaminer.com/2008/12/02/hey-wheres-my-10-billion-professional-edition-fed-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

