<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Wall Street Examiner &#187; Contrary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wallstreetexaminer.com/tag/contrary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wallstreetexaminer.com</link>
	<description>Be prepared. Stay ahead of the herd.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:01:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Jim Rogers: &quot;The Fed is Lying to Us&quot;</title>
		<link>http://wallstreetexaminer.com/2011/12/08/jim-rogers-the-fed-is-lying-to-us/</link>
		<comments>http://wallstreetexaminer.com/2011/12/08/jim-rogers-the-fed-is-lying-to-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 10:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Zeiler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Money Morning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contrary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creeping Inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debtor Nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fed Chairman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve Chairman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal reserve conspiracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fomc Meeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History Of The World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Rogers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legend Jim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Low Interest Rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Supply]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Printing Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trillion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trillions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[what is the federal reserve bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[what is the federal reserve rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Who Owns The Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo Finance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymorning.com/?p=60194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite statements to the contrary, the U.S. Federal Reserve  has continued to pump money into the economy, says investing legend Jim Rogers.<br /><br />
The resulting low interest rates and creeping inflation, he  says, are destroying the wealth of millions.<br /><br />
"[Federal Reserve Chairman Ben] Bernanke said last August he  was keeping interest rates artificially low," <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/breakout/fed-ruining-entire-class-investors-says-jim-rogers-153315477.html">Rogers  told <strong><em>Yahoo!  Finance</em></strong></a>on Tuesday. "The only way you can do that is to go into the  market."<br /><br />
As proof, Rogers pointed to the rise in the broad M2 measure  of the U.S. money supply, which has increased more than 5% since the Fed's  second quantitative easing program (QE2) ended on June 30, and 20% since  November 2008.<br /><br />
"Since August - well, this whole year - the M2 has jumped  up," Rogers said. "They're in the market. They're lying to us."<br /><br />
A well-known critic of the Fed who has called for it to be  abolished, Rogers warned that the central bank's policies would lead to  disaster.<br /><br />
"Right now what the Federal Reserve is doing is ruining an  entire class of people in America," Rogers said. "The people who saved and  invested for the past 10, 20, 30 years are now being ruined because interest  rates are [too] low."<br /><br />
He added that if he were Fed chairman, he'd raise interest  rates to slow down inflation. <br /><br />
In a separate <a target="_blank" href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/11334734/1/jim-rogers-abolish-the-fed-buy-commodities-short-stocks.html">interview  with <strong><em>The  Street</em></strong></a>yesterday (Wednesday), Rogers said he considered the Fed to be  the greatest risk to the U.S. economy in 2012.<br /><br />
"They don't seem to understand economics or finance or  currencies or much of anything else except printing money," Rogers said.<br /><br />
<h3>Painful Remedies</h3>

The other major concern that Rogers has is the soaring  federal debt, which recently passed $15 trillion.<br /><br />
"We are the largest debtor nation in the history of the  world and the debts are going higher and higher by trillions, every two or  three years," Rogers said. "We're all  paying the price for it. And wait till 2013 - we're really going to pay the  price."<br /><br />
<strong><em><a href="http://moneymorning.com/2011/12/08/jim-rogers-the-fed-is-lying-to-us/" target="_self">To continue reading, please click here...</a></em></strong><br /><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wallstreetexaminer.com/2011/12/08/jim-rogers-the-fed-is-lying-to-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some Speculative Charts for Weekend Discussion</title>
		<link>http://wallstreetexaminer.com/2011/10/22/some-speculative-charts-for-weekend-discussion/</link>
		<comments>http://wallstreetexaminer.com/2011/10/22/some-speculative-charts-for-weekend-discussion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 11:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pretzel Logic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pretzel Logic E Wave Analysis and Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contrary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friggin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Head And Shoulders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loop 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minyanville]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nbsp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neckline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Possibilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rally]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speculation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spx]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wallstreetexaminer.com/?guid=7487ad8057414a8611937140b9ca7acc</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The regular Weekend Update will be posted before the open.

Important note for the general public:&#160; These charts are for speculation and discussion, they are&#160;not preferred counts.&#160; In other words, they are possibilities/potentials which ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wallstreetexaminer.com/2011/10/22/some-speculative-charts-for-weekend-discussion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Retail Sales No Reason for Market Party</title>
		<link>http://wallstreetexaminer.com/2011/06/14/retail-sales-no-reason-for-market-party/</link>
		<comments>http://wallstreetexaminer.com/2011/06/14/retail-sales-no-reason-for-market-party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lee Adler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Today's Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adjusted Basis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Census Bureau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contrary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divergence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gas Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gasoline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Technicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mid 1990s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Momentum Indicator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Doubt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rest Of The World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail Sales Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales Momentum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weak Dollar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wallstreetexaminer.com/?p=51753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today&#8217;s retail sales report was far from a reason for the market to party. The media are reporting that on a seasonally adjusted basis, nominal retail sales fell less than expected. An analysis of real retail sales suggests that the underlying trend is weakening, and that contrary to the market&#8217;s reaction today, the outlook may be less than rosy for stocks. In order to filter out the effect of sharply higher gas prices and their impact on sales, I looked at the data on a historical basis ex gas prices. According to a breakdown of the retail sales data provided by the Census Bureau, actual, not seasonally manipulated data for nominal retail sales ex gasoline rose by 6.2% on an annual basis. That sounds great, aided no doubt by the weak dollar drawing shoppers to the US from the rest of the world. However, adjusted for inflation, the gain was only 2.9%. The growth rate fell from 3.4% in April and a peak of 7.6% in November 2010. This 6 month decline in the rate of growth of real retail sales suggests that the stimulus driven recovery is ending. If I am right, the numbers should turn negative in July [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wallstreetexaminer.com/2011/06/14/retail-sales-no-reason-for-market-party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Economy Is Nearly Back to Normal&#8230;..NOT!</title>
		<link>http://forums.wallstreetexaminer.com/topic/942761-the-economy-is-nearly-back-to-normalnot/</link>
		<comments>http://forums.wallstreetexaminer.com/topic/942761-the-economy-is-nearly-back-to-normalnot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 13:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>a Wall Street Examiner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bears Chat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best of the Forums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Armageddon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Awkwardness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bear Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bulls And Bears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contrary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Embarrassment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Empathy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website Images]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forums.wallstreetexaminer.com/topic/942761-the-economy-is-nearly-back-to-normalnot/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good piece from the Financial Armageddon website....

Although the images featured in the following four reports might make  you blush with embarrassment, they are not titillating at all. On the  contrary, any red-faced awkwardness you experience after...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wallstreetexaminer.com/2011/03/08/the-economy-is-nearly-back-to-normal-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Incredible Absence of Fear in the Markets</title>
		<link>http://forums.wallstreetexaminer.com/topic/936858-the-incredible-absence-of-fear-in-the-markets/</link>
		<comments>http://forums.wallstreetexaminer.com/topic/936858-the-incredible-absence-of-fear-in-the-markets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>a Wall Street Examiner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bears Chat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best of the Forums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Absence Of Fear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bear Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bulls And Bears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contrary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow 14000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow Levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Jack Bogle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Participants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safehaven]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forums.wallstreetexaminer.com/topic/936858-the-incredible-absence-of-fear-in-the-markets/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does Dow 12000+ Feel Like the Days of Dow 14000+?

If you have trouble imagining a 20% loss in the stock market, you shouldn't 	be in stocks. - John (Jack) Bogle 

Isn't the above quote exactly the current problem? Majority of participants   can't even...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wallstreetexaminer.com/2011/02/18/the-incredible-absence-of-fear-in-the-markets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China&#8217;s Real Estate Bubble Economy in Big Trouble</title>
		<link>http://forums.wallstreetexaminer.com/topic/916781-chinas-real-estate-bubble-economy-in-big-trouble/</link>
		<comments>http://forums.wallstreetexaminer.com/topic/916781-chinas-real-estate-bubble-economy-in-big-trouble/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>a Wall Street Examiner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bears Chat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best of the Forums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5 Million]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Assumptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bear Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Trouble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bubble Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bulls And Bears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cnbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cnbc Interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contrary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Driven Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gdp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hedge Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Incentives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Chanos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kynikos Associates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Bubble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residential Buildings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residential Units]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uble]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forums.wallstreetexaminer.com/topic/916781-chinas-real-estate-bubble-economy-in-big-trouble/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jim Chanos, founder of hedge fund Kynikos Associates, is arguably the  most well-known short-seller in the world, having predicted the  high-profile demise of companies like Enron. Now, Chanos is setting his  sights on China, the world's second largest...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wallstreetexaminer.com/2010/12/13/chinas-real-estate-bubble-economy-in-big-trouble/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Were the Bush Tax Cuts Good for Growth?</title>
		<link>http://forums.wallstreetexaminer.com/topic/910294-were-the-bush-tax-cuts-good-for-growth/</link>
		<comments>http://forums.wallstreetexaminer.com/topic/910294-were-the-bush-tax-cuts-good-for-growth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 20:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>a Wall Street Examiner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bears Chat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best of the Forums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bear Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bulls And Bears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush Tax Cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contrary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Leonhardt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Importance Of Economic Growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Promises]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spirit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World War Ii]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forums.wallstreetexaminer.com/topic/910294-were-the-bush-tax-cuts-good-for-growth/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[November 18, 2010, 8:45 am 
Were the Bush Tax Cuts Good for Growth?
By DAVID LEONHARDT

Liz Peek at FoxNews.com congratulates me for writing about the importance of economic growth. So in the spirit of maximizing growth, I want to pose a question: Why ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wallstreetexaminer.com/2010/11/18/were-the-bush-tax-cuts-good-for-growth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax cuts: Small biz fact check</title>
		<link>http://forums.wallstreetexaminer.com/topic/898713-tax-cuts-small-biz-fact-check/</link>
		<comments>http://forums.wallstreetexaminer.com/topic/898713-tax-cuts-small-biz-fact-check/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 13:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>a Wall Street Examiner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bears Chat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best of the Forums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Assertions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bear Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black And White]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brackets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bulls And Bears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Section]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cnn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cnnmoney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contrary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fact Check]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Job Creation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonsense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rental Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shades Of Gray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Definition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forums.wallstreetexaminer.com/topic/898713-tax-cuts-small-biz-fact-check/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tax cuts: Small biz fact check


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Republicans say raising taxes on the wealthy would cause small businesses to pull back on hiring. Many leading Democrats say that's nonsense. Who's right?

The answer isn't black and white, de...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wallstreetexaminer.com/2010/09/20/tax-cuts-small-biz-fact-check/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Are 86% of the NY Fed&#8217;s MBS Purchases Occurring During Option Expiration Weeks?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JessesCafeAmericain/~3/yFUwSu30A5M/is-fed-timing-its-mortgage-backed.html</link>
		<comments>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JessesCafeAmericain/~3/yFUwSu30A5M/is-fed-timing-its-mortgage-backed.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 02:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Today's Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[30 Year Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banks In The Us]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central Banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contrary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Critical Forces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liquidity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Machinations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mbs Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Market Operations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Option Expiration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Options Expiration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professional Edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Relic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subscribers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treasury Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JessesCafeAmericain/~4/yFUwSu30A5M" height="1"/>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wallstreetexaminer.com/2010/01/21/why-are-86-of-the-ny-feds-mbs-purchases-occurring-during-option-expiration-weeks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Little Lies and Big Spin- Gains or Blips?</title>
		<link>http://wallstreetexaminer.com/2009/09/01/more-little-lies-and-big-spin-gains-or-blips/</link>
		<comments>http://wallstreetexaminer.com/2009/09/01/more-little-lies-and-big-spin-gains-or-blips/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 19:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lee Adler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Today's Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contract Activity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contrary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Quarter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Time Buyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infomercial Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inventories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Little Lies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nar Realtors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Purchasing Managers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realtors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reo Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seasonal Adjustment Factors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Significant Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zillow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wallstreetexaminer.com/?p=5740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The FIM (Financial Infomercial Media) has gifted us with more nonsense today in the form of Pending Homes Sales data from the NAR (Realtors) and the Purchasing Managers Manufacturing Index from the ISM (Purchasing Managers). Bloomberg was positively ecstatic about the housing data, proclaiming &#8220;The number of contracts to buy previously owned homes rose more than forecast in July and increased for a record sixth consecutive month, reinforcing signs that the housing market is steadying.&#8221; Here&#8217;s what the NAR had to say. &#8220;Contract activity for pending home sales has risen for six straight months, a pattern not seen in the history of the index since it began in 2001.&#8221; There&#8217;s just one problem. It&#8217;s all a lie. The rise was only due to seasonal adjustment factors. In fact, unadjusted pending home sales (sales contracts) were actually DOWN 7% month to month. True, that&#8217;s not as bad as last year when the index dove by 10%, but is this difference significant? Sales are higher than last year, but still below July 2007 when the housing recession was already under way. And last year there was no first time buyer tax credit. The question is where the market will be when this [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wallstreetexaminer.com/2009/09/01/more-little-lies-and-big-spin-gains-or-blips/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

