US Senator Elizabeth Warren probably thinks that the T-Rexs and Raptors in Jurassic Park can be regulated or contained. Just like she thinks that G-SIBS can be regulated without causing harm to the economy. But life finds a way.
Liquidity moves markets!Follow the money. Find the profits!
Quicken Loans (and Rocket Mortgage) are examples of financial institutions that escape regulation by remaining a privatley-held corporations. But there are zads of ways to avoid regulations imposed on financial institutions.
Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren wants to make sure top executives at mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are not being paid more than a congressionally-mandated salary cap allows.
An example of bypassing the regulatory swamp? Regulations prohibit Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac CEOs from making more than $600,000 per year.
In a recently unveiled proposal – called the Respect the Caps Act – Warren is looking to close a loophole both agencies are said to be taking advantage of in order to pay their top executives millions.
Warren’s legislation was developed in response to a watchdog report from the Federal Housing Finance Agency’s (FHFA) Inspector General. According to the report, the FHFA – which oversees Fannie and Freddie – approved plans that circumvented the congressionally-mandated salary cap at the two agencies, which is set at $600,000. This was said to be done by separating the CEO and president roles, transferring tasks from the CEO to the president, and raising the president’s pay. Presidents are not subject to the pay cap.
As a result, two executives at Fannie were said to be paid $4.2 million to perform the same tasks a CEO has performed for $600,000. At Freddie, the figure was $3.85 million.
“Following the financial crisis, Congress passed my bipartisan bill to cap pay raises for executives at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Instead of enforcing the law, the FHFA has allowed executive compensation at Fannie to increase by $3.6 million and at Freddie, by $3.25 million,” Warren said in a press release.
If the director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency – a post that Mark Calabria was just confirmed to – were to approve salaries that exceeded the $600,000 cap, he could be removed according to the terms of the bill.
The cap was put in place in 2015 after the former FHFA director sought to allow executives to receive a hefty, multimillion dollar pay package.
The former FHFA diector was … Mel Watt/
Wall Street Examiner Disclosure:Lee Adler, The Wall Street Examiner reposts third party content with the permission of the publisher. I curate posts here on the basis of whether they represent an interesting and logical point of view, that may or may not agree with my own views. Some of the content includes the original publisher's promotional messages. I may receive promotional consideration on a contingent basis, when paid subscriptions result. The opinions expressed in these reposts are not those of the Wall Street Examiner or Lee Adler, unless authored by me, under my byline. No endorsement of third party content is either expressed or implied by posting the content. Do your own due diligence when considering the offerings of information providers.