There is considerable divergence between China and the US in terms of financial condition. The trade disagreement between China and the US comes to mind.
First, there is considerable divergence between Hong Kong’s 1-month interbank lending rate, HIBOR, and the US 1-month interbank lending rate LIBOR. In fact, the divergence is the greatest since the financiak crisis. For the moment, the US Fed is engaged in quantitative tightening (QT) while China is frantically going the opposite direction.
Liquidity moves markets!Click here to learn how you can follow the money.
Second, Central bank balance-sheet divergence is reducing the impact of China’s government-induced liquidity injections, contributing to an increase in corporate defaults. Since Fed run-off began in October 2017, the impact of People’s Bank of China (PBOC) balance-sheet expansion has diminished considerably, as the FX-adjusted effect of last year’s 1 trillion yuan in central bank stimulus resulted in a $160 billion contraction when converted into U.S. dollars. Total assets at China’s central bank rose 2.6% to a record 37.2 trillion yuan in 2018. Yet, when expressed in dollars, the PBoC’s balance sheet fell by 2.9% to $5.4 trillion.
Chinese onshore defaults rose to a record $16.5 billion in 2018, and are up $1.4 billion year-to-date. China offshore defaults rose to $3.3 billion in 2018, and are up another $275 million in 2019.
The Dow is up over 200 points on a deal preventing a US government shutdown. Democrats agreed to build a wall between the US and Mexico … 55 miles of the 2,000 mile US-Mexico border. As if drug traffickers (and cartels), human traffickers and gangs like MS-13 can’t figure out how to bypass the 55 miles of additional walls.
Wall Street Examiner Disclosure:Lee Adler, The Wall Street Examiner reposts third party content with the permission of the publisher. I am a contractor for Money Map Press, publisher of Money Morning, Sure Money, and other information products. I curate posts here on the basis of whether they represent an interesting and logical point of view, that may or may not agree with my own views. Some of the content includes the original publisher's promotional messages. In some cases I receive promotional consideration on a contingent basis, when paid subscriptions result. The opinions expressed in these reposts are not those of the Wall Street Examiner or Lee Adler, unless authored by me, under my byline. No endorsement of third party content is either expressed or implied by posting the content. Do your own due diligence when considering the offerings of information providers.