It’s A Slump Now

This is a syndicated repost courtesy of Alhambra Investments. To view original, click here. Reposted with permission.

If it wasn’t before, it is definitely a slump now. The National Association of Realtors (NAR) said today that the sales of existing homes across the US in September 2018 fell more than 3% seasonally-adjusted from August. At just 5.15 million (SAAR), that’s the lowest volume in almost three years.

Hurricane Harvey had managed to disrupt a good chunk of resale activity in September 2017, and yet there is only Florence to blame for September 2018 which managed somehow to post significantly fewer home sales. Year-over-year, sales activity dropped by more than 4%.

Economists want to make this about interest rates. That’s a big change from late last year when the hurricane high had many convinced that the economy was so much booming not even the Fed could disrupt the real estate sector.

To begin 2018, there was only strong, robust, and the several variations of the theme. Resales had reached an 11-year high which supposedly meant like everything else globally synchronized growth was real and inflation hysteria justified. The consequences of those would have been, had they been legitimate processes, higher mortgage rates regardless. The economy is booming, requiring normalization, and then normalization totally disrupts the boom?

That’s not how this works. Three-quarters through the year, it’s a different story:

A decade’s high mortgage rates are preventing consumers from making quick decisions on home purchases. All the while, affordable home listings remain low, continuing to spur underperforming sales activity across the country.

Mortgage rates follow the 10-year UST benchmark rate. They started the year, on average ~4%. Interest rose to ~4.6% for most of the summer including September. A 60 bps increase off historic lows is time for a sizable housing slump?

It’s not the chart for mortgage rates that should have gotten realtors attention. Instead, it’s this one from the NAR:

Sales were down across-the-board in September, at all levels. For the past few years, the real estate market had been bifurcated like the economy. Those who were doing well bought high end houses no matter what happened along the way, no matter how much they cost including monthly payment schedules. Those who haven’t been, and in this economy the last eleven years there are way, way too many of these “missing” Americans, they not only stopped buying houses they actually stopped selling what they had been fortunate enough to hold onto.

Inventory may have bottomed out in recent months, but now demand is weak even in the upper tiers. That’s a potentially broad-based shift that suggests something way more potent (negative) than 60 bps of interest rates.

A housing slump just isn’t consistent with a booming economy, which is why the blame for the Fed. They make a very convenient scapegoat this time because they are for the first time acting in the same direction as the real world (eurodollars and the economy). The world tried hard to pretend 2015 didn’t happen, or that it was an oil supply glut and distant overseas turmoil.

It didn’t hit the resale market all that much – except in the undercurrent of inventory shrinking like income growth and the slowing labor market. Now the next one, possibly, is showing up in 2018 in far more places across the housing landscape, sales to construction.

Instead, it may be that even people on top are starting to get a little nervous about the (always unexpected) reappearance of “overseas turmoil.” And not just home buyers, perhaps also the banks funding them.

Even though the economy is strong, Wells Fargo (WFC) is lending less. The bank’s loan book dipped by 1% from a year ago as mortgages fell sharply.

Strong.

Wall Street Examiner Disclosure:Lee Adler, The Wall Street Examiner reposts third party content with the permission of the publisher. I am a contractor for Money Map Press, publisher of Money Morning, Sure Money, and other information products. I curate posts here on the basis of whether they represent an interesting and logical point of view, that may or may not agree with my own views. Some of the content includes the original publisher's promotional messages. In some cases I receive promotional consideration on a contingent basis, when paid subscriptions result. The opinions expressed in these reposts are not those of the Wall Street Examiner or Lee Adler, unless authored by me, under my byline. No endorsement of third party content is either expressed or implied by posting the content. Do your own due diligence when considering the offerings of information providers.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.