New York Fed Releases Research Article on U.S. Household Leverage

This is a syndicated repost courtesy of NY | Press Releases . To view original, click here. Reposted with permission.

NEW YORK—The Federal Reserve Bank of New York today released Tracking and Stress-Testing U.S. Household Leverage, a research article that will be published in a forthcoming issue of the Economic Policy Review, the Bank’s policy-oriented journal focused on macroeconomic, banking and financial market topics.

Housing equity is an important component of borrowers’ wealth and is critical to their ability to withstand economic shocks. In this article, the authors assess risks emanating from the housing sector by tracking the evolution of household leverage—the ratio of housing debt to housing values. They use a new data set to analyze household leverage over time and across locations in the United States. They find that leverage was low before 2006, rose rapidly through 2012, and then fell back toward pre-crisis lows by early 2017 as home prices recovered.

Using borrower-level leverage measures and updated borrower credit scores, the authors conduct “stress tests” that project leverage and defaults under various adverse house price scenarios. They find that the household sector is still vulnerable to severe house-price declines, although it has become steadily less risky in recent years.

The article is written by Andrew Haughwout, Andreas Fuster and Benedict Guttman-Kenney. Haughwout is a senior vice president and Fuster was formerly a research officer in the New York Fed’s Research and Statistics Group. Guttman-Kenney is a senior economist in the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority.

Contact
Betsy Bourassa
(212) 720-6885
betsy.bourassa@ny.frb.org

Wall Street Examiner Disclosure:Lee Adler, The Wall Street Examiner reposts third party content with the permission of the publisher. I am a contractor for Money Map Press, publisher of Money Morning, Sure Money, and other information products. I curate posts here on the basis of whether they represent an interesting and logical point of view, that may or may not agree with my own views. Some of the content includes the original publisher's promotional messages. In some cases I receive promotional consideration on a contingent basis, when paid subscriptions result. The opinions expressed in these reposts are not those of the Wall Street Examiner or Lee Adler, unless authored by me, under my byline. No endorsement of third party content is either expressed or implied by posting the content. Do your own due diligence when considering the offerings of information providers.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.