The Pension Boogie: Global Pension Deficit $400 Trillion By 2050 (5X Today’s Entire Global Economy)

This is a syndicated repost courtesy of Confounded Interest. To view original, click here. Reposted with permission.

The World Economic Forum said in a study that the pension deficit is growing by $28 billion every 24 hours – and if nothing is done to slow the growth rate, the deficit will reach $400 trillion by 2050, or about five times the size of the global economy today.

The big offenders in the pension boogie are 1) the United States and 2) China.

pension-time-bomb

So what is the boogie? The boogie is that governments continue to promise exorbitant pension payouts while collecting a fraction of the money from contributors.

The State of California is an example of the pension boogie. California’s public employee pension systems have immense gaps – called “unfunded liabilities” – between what they have in assets and what they will need to meet their obligations to retirees. 

A half-dozen Los Angeles police and firefighters received pension payouts of $1 million or more in 2016 — two reaching $1.4 million, according to Transparent California, a watchdog database listing individual state and local government employee salaries and pensions.

Well, SOMEONE has to pay those ludicrous pension payouts. Including communities that are now required to contribute MORE to pensions.

So while political pundits point the finger about Trump’s trillion dollar Federal deficits (conveniently forgetting about Obama’s 4 years of trillion dollar deficits), most ignore the larger bomb on the horizon: public pensions.

At least Social Security caps their payout to recipients.

blaast

Time to do “The Pension Boogie.”

Wall Street Examiner Disclosure:Lee Adler, The Wall Street Examiner reposts third party content with the permission of the publisher. I am a contractor for Money Map Press, publisher of Money Morning, Sure Money, and other information products. I curate posts here on the basis of whether they represent an interesting and logical point of view, that may or may not agree with my own views. Some of the content includes the original publisher's promotional messages. In some cases I receive promotional consideration on a contingent basis, when paid subscriptions result. The opinions expressed in these reposts are not those of the Wall Street Examiner or Lee Adler, unless authored by me, under my byline. No endorsement of third party content is either expressed or implied by posting the content. Do your own due diligence when considering the offerings of information providers.

Leave a Reply