10 Years After: Where are the GSEs 10 Years After the Financial Crisis?

This is a syndicated repost courtesy of Confounded Interest. To view original, click here. Reposted with permission.

Meghan Milloy at American Action Forum has an interesting piece today entitled “Where are the GSEs 10 Years After the Financial Crisis?”

It reminds me of Ten Years After’s “I’m Going Home.” But in the case of mortgage giants, Fannie Mae and Freddie, the song should be titled “They’re Going Nowhere.”

“Unfortunately, 10 years later, the GSEs are still in conservatorship, Congress has passed no major legislation to overhaul the GSEs or the housing-finance system as a whole, and Fannie and Freddie are returning to some of the dangerous activity that led to the last crisis. Even five years ago The Wall Street Journal said that fixing the GSEs was the “largest single piece of unfinished business from the financial crisis.””

True, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac stock crashed starting in Q4 2007 culminating in both being placed into conservatorship with their regulator, FHFA. Where they remain today.

fffhfa

Then there was the notorious “profit sweep” where Treasury in 2012 (despite Treasury Secretary Geithner knowing in 2011 that Fannie and Freddie would soon be profitable again). So now all Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac profits go directly in Treasury coffers. THAT is the current equilibrium.

Particularly worriesome since Fannie and Freddie can’t accumulate capital to serve as a buffer.

So, we’re now “On the road again” to see what will happen next to Fannie and Freddie. Particularly since FHFA Director Mel Watt’s term ends in December.

Is this FHFA Director Mel Watt singing “Ookie, ookie, ooh!”?

melwatt

 

 

Wall Street Examiner Disclosure:Lee Adler, The Wall Street Examiner reposts third party content with the permission of the publisher. I am a contractor for Money Map Press, publisher of Money Morning, Sure Money, and other information products. I curate posts here on the basis of whether they represent an interesting and logical point of view, that may or may not agree with my own views. Some of the content includes the original publisher's promotional messages. In some cases I receive promotional consideration on a contingent basis, when paid subscriptions result. The opinions expressed in these reposts are not those of the Wall Street Examiner or Lee Adler, unless authored by me, under my byline. No endorsement of third party content is either expressed or implied by posting the content. Do your own due diligence when considering the offerings of information providers.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.