Construction Spending Unrelated To Harvey and Irma (Though Some That Is)

This is a syndicated repost courtesy of Alhambra Investments. To view original, click here. Reposted with permission.

Public construction spending has rebounded since July last year on what looks to be storm-related cleanup costs. The Census Bureau unfortunately does not break down total spending by geographic region, which, obviously, would clarify whether or not this has been the case. For now, absent also estimates for Q4 state and local tax collections, we will have to be content noting the timing of the upward turn which corresponds directly with Harvey and Irma’s arrivals as well as their immediate and messy aftermath.

On the private side, there is less positives to report regardless of reasons. For some time now, businesses have become clearly reluctant to invest in physical facilities, at least domestically. For January, Private Non-residential Construction Spending was down slightly. It’s not the magnitude of the decline that is worth mention, rather it is the continued duration as well as the timing.

That latter dimension does not, I don’t think, correspond with the hurricanes since the slowdown long predates them. It is impossible to say for sure that there weren’t any negative effects at all, or positives for that matter, only that unlike in public construction activity there is no obvious correlation (with the hurricanes) as far as the calendar.

This is in every way contrary to economic “reflation” sentiment that in markets at least began around the very same time. For any true economic boom to manifest, it will have to start on the so-called supply side. Construction spending is not a comprehensive estimate for total capex, but it is a reasonable proxy for intentions.

Thus, if the US and global economy was on the verge of some serious acceleration why isn’t it happening here? What is suggested is an increase in caution about macro factors, not an easing or even alleviation of them. Furthermore, the timing and the direction correspond only too well with the slowdown in the labor market, another hefty financial commitment that along with capex suggests in action how companies view the economy as it is apart from mainstream commentary (or surveys about business and manufacturing sentiment).

More concerning still is that now the residential portion of the construction industry has joined the other in exhibiting weakness. This again may or may not be related to Harvey and Irma, though that seems unlikely given that the pattern of storm-related distortion is first a boost and then a return to the pre-storm baseline. Here, there is simply a looming shift in trajectory, and one consistent with other real estate data likewise suggesting a growing problem (multi-family structures, primarily, but some possible softening in single family activity, too).

None of this suggests imminent recession, but it does raise caution about the marginal economic direction. The inflation hysteria has it that the economy is not just moving forward but doing so in potentially rapid fashion. There’s none of that here, rather a possible gentle rolling over that might portend the visible contours of the next downturn. What that might ultimately mean is a question for much further down the road, for now it’s enough simply to note there is here no boom, and as time passes a lower likelihood of one.

Wall Street Examiner Disclosure:Lee Adler, The Wall Street Examiner reposts third party content with the permission of the publisher. I am a contractor for Money Map Press, publisher of Money Morning, Sure Money, and other information products. I curate posts here on the basis of whether they represent an interesting and logical point of view, that may or may not agree with my own views. Some of the content includes the original publisher's promotional messages. In some cases I receive promotional consideration on a contingent basis, when paid subscriptions result. The opinions expressed in these reposts are not those of the Wall Street Examiner or Lee Adler, unless authored by me, under my byline. No endorsement of third party content is either expressed or implied by posting the content. Do your own due diligence when considering the offerings of information providers.

Leave a Reply