December Durable Goods

This is a syndicated repost courtesy of Alhambra Investments. To view original, click here. Reposted with permission.

Durable and capital goods orders and shipments all increased in December by growth rates consistent with those registered in the months leading up to the big storms Harvey and Irma. We continue to find evidence that accelerated growth in October and November was nothing more than the anticipated after-effects cleaning up after those hurricanes.

New orders for durable goods (excluding transportation orders) had increased year-over-year (unadjusted) by 6.2%, 6.8%, 6.6%, and 6.7% in the four months June to September, respectively. In October, orders picked up to 9.8%, followed by a gain of 8.8% in November. The most recent estimates put December at once more 6.7%.

The same trend has worked out in capital goods. Shipments (excluding defense and aircraft shipments) had increased by 4.5%, 7.2%, 7.4%, and 6.6%, in the summer months on through to September. Growth accelerated to 11.4% and 10.1% in October and November, respectively. For December, the year-over-year change slowed down back to 6.8%.

The seasonally-adjusted version for capital goods shipments highlights the anomaly.

As with the housing data for December, durable goods estimates all lean in the direction of distortion rather than meaningful acceleration. These growth rates outside of October and November are consistent with the same lackluster growth we’ve been stuck with since 2012. As Q4 GDP declared for yet another quarter, nothing has changed. In fact, the BEA figure for GDP managed only 2.6% during that one despite these storm effects packed heavily into the first two months of that quarter.

Wall Street Examiner Disclosure:Lee Adler, The Wall Street Examiner reposts third party content with the permission of the publisher. I am a contractor for Money Map Press, publisher of Money Morning, Sure Money, and other information products. I curate posts here on the basis of whether they represent an interesting and logical point of view, that may or may not agree with my own views. Some of the content includes the original publisher's promotional messages. In some cases I receive promotional consideration on a contingent basis, when paid subscriptions result. The opinions expressed in these reposts are not those of the Wall Street Examiner or Lee Adler, unless authored by me, under my byline. No endorsement of third party content is either expressed or implied by posting the content. Do your own due diligence when considering the offerings of information providers.

Leave a Reply