This is a syndicated repost courtesy of oftwominds-Charles Hugh Smith. To view original, click here. Reposted with permission.
Clearly, the core strategy of maintaining the status quo is to borrow and spend trillions of additional dollars every year.
The Grand Strategy of the post-Global Financial Crisis era was simple: maintain the status quo as is. The Obama administration’s major policy initiative, ObamaCare, a.k.a. the Affordable Care Act, was nothing but the formalization of the existing status quo in healthcare, i.e. the taxpayers subsidize private-sector profiteering.The Obama presidency was a grand experiment to test this thesis: the status quo of the U.S. is a self-correcting mechanism. Left to its own devices, it will automatically correct any socio-economic-political imbalances, given enough time.
That is the Affordable Care Act in a nutshell. Costs have not declined, the health of Americans can hardly be said to have improved significantly, but garsh, did healthcare sector profits soar. Most importantly, the status quo was maintained: nothing actually changed in the insurance, pharmaceutical or hospital sectors.
The same can be said for every other sector of the economy: nothing really changed, just more of the same. Higher education: nothing changed, just more student loan debt was issued. The defense industry: more of the same. Global War on Terror, a.k.a. The National Security State–more billions sluiced into the shadows.
President Obama was a master of telling everyone what they wanted to hear while changing nothing in the basic structure of the Empire. The Imperial Imperative of destabilizing nations that didn’t meet with Imperial approval continued unchanged. The murder-by-drone campaign expanded, the support of a hopelessly corrupt regime in Afghanistan continued unchanged, and so on.
There were two unstated assumptions in this eight-year experiment:
1. The status quo is perfectly fine and didn’t need changing
2. The self-correcting mechanism of the status quo–the self-serving pursuit of maximizing private gain–naturally yielded up whatever policy tweaks were deemed beneficial/ necessary.
If there is any dividing line in America today, it’s not political: it’s the division between those who see the status quo arrangement as marvelously successful, and those who see the tiller lashed down tight as the great ship heads for shoals that will rip the hull to shreds.
Those in the first camp see no need to change anything beyond minor policy tweaks. Those in the second camp see an unsustainable status quo that kicked the can down the road for eight years rather than tackle the systemic problems that are undermining the nation.
It’s too early to say if the eight year experiment is a success or a failure. There is precious little evidence that the relentless self-serving pursuit of maximizing private gain is magically self-correcting what’s broken. Rather, it seems that existing extremes are simply being pushed to new extremes–for example, student loan debt:
Clearly, the core strategy of maintaining the status quo is to borrow and spend trillions of additional dollars every year. Fortunately for the status quo, near-zero interest rates have created the comforting illusion that debt doesn’t matter because it’s almost free.
Wall Street Examiner Disclosure:Lee Adler, The Wall Street Examiner reposts third party content with the permission of the publisher. I am a contractor for Money Map Press, publisher of Money Morning, Sure Money, and other information products. I curate posts here on the basis of whether they represent an interesting and logical point of view, that may or may not agree with my own views. Some of the content includes the original publisher's promotional messages. In some cases I receive promotional consideration on a contingent basis, when paid subscriptions result. The opinions expressed in these reposts are not those of the Wall Street Examiner or Lee Adler, unless authored by me, under my byline. No endorsement of third party content is either expressed or implied by posting the content. Do your own due diligence when considering the offerings of information providers.