These Congressmen Want You to Pay for Their Second Home

This is a syndicated repost courtesy of Money Morning – We Make Investing Profitable. To view original, click here. Reposted with permission.

Share!Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInEmail this to someonePrint this page

Congress members earning $174,000 a year have it so bad they can’t afford to rent a place to stay in Washington to do the nation’s business.

Congress

So one former Congressman – just-resigned Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) – has proposed lawmakers get a taxpayer-funded $2,500 per month allowance to cover their housing expenses while in Washington.

(Chaffetz gave up his seat in Congressin the middle of his fifth term for a job as a Fox News contributor.)

That would effectively boost the typical congressional salary by $30,000 per year and, if extended to all 535 members, collectively cost taxpayers $16 million.

This proposal couldn’t be any more tone deaf…

Lawmakers Believe Charity Begins at Their Second Home

“Washington, D.C., is one of the most expensive places in the world, and I flat-out cannot afford a mortgage in Utah, kids in college, and a second place here in Washington, D.C.,” Chaffetz told The Hill just days before his June 30 resignation. “I think a $2,500 housing allowance would be appropriate and a real help to have at least a decent quality of life in Washington if you’re going to expect people to spend hundreds of nights a year here.”

From the beginning of his first term in 2009, Chaffetz made a point of sleeping in his Capitol Hill office to keep from blowing his family budget. And he wasn’t alone. Estimates put the number of Congress members bunking in their offices between 45 and 70.

Clearly, Chaffetz is far from the only lawmaker who thinks such largesse for a group that earns three times more than America’s median household income makes sense. In fact, it’s one of the rare ideas on Capitol Hill that has bipartisan support.

Rep. Alcee Hastings (D-FL.), who publicly complained in 2015 when the rent of his D.C. apartment increased from $2,100 to $3,100 a month, told The Hill last week that he agreed in principle with his departing Republican colleague. But he’d lower the monthly stipend to $1,700 a month to make the proposal less politically toxic.

Frankly, fear of voter backlash is just about the only thing holding Congress back from voting itself yet another perk.

Must See: Secret test site at New Mexico “ghost city.” What exactly is going on there? Read more…

At least they’re not so dense as to imagine that taxpayers are shedding tears for their plight. The median U.S. household income is about $56,000, but many households live on far less.

According to U.S. Census Bureau data, 32.1% of all U.S. households (40.5 million out of 126 million) have a total income of under $35,000 a year – and they’re not begging on the Capitol steps for a $30,000 a year handout.

Maybe the members of Congress could learn a thing or two about frugality from those they represent…

Members of Congress Need Some Lessons in Downsizing

It’s true that most Americans don’t need to maintain two homes, particularly when one of those homes is located in one of the most expensive housing regions in the country.

But lawmakers who think they can’t pay for two homes on a salary of $174,000 a year are drunk on their own extravagant lifestyles.

First off, they don’t need $2,500 a month for a modest Washington apartment – they’re too busy to need anything fancy.

A look at Zillow shows that some apartments within walking distance of the Capitol do indeed go for $2,500 a month and up. But it’s also not hard to find apartments priced at between $1,500 and $2,000.

And some two-bedroom units go for about $3,000 a month. Why not room with another lawmaker to cut costs? That’s a basic strategy millions of Americans fall back on when trying to put a roof over their heads.

The other side of this equation is resources. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, the average net worth of a member of Congress is about $7 million, in addition to the $174,000 annual salary. More than half of all members are millionaires.

Let’s look at the case of Jason Chaffetz, since he’s put the spotlight on himself…

When You’re Part of the 1%, You Don’t Need Taxpayer Money

Chaffetz is a good example because he falls in the middle of the Congressional pack in terms of net worth. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, he ranked 239th in the House, with an estimated net worth of $569,000 in 2014.

What people often forget, though, is that most members of Congress are married to someone who also has a successful and lucrative career.

Chaffetz’s wife Julie, for instance, is a reconstructive plastic surgeon. According to Salary.com, the pay range for that occupation in Provo, Utah, falls between $230,000 and $489,000.

Even if what Julie Chaffetz makes is at the lower end of the range, her salary pushes their total household income north of $400,000. And Rep. Chaffetz can’t afford a $2,000 per month apartment?

Congressman

Maybe Jason Chaffetz doesn’t need a home quite this swanky.

Possibly the mortgage on his Utah home (see photo) is too high. Chaffetz owns a six-bedroom, 2.5-bath, 2,894-square-foot home that sits on 1.45 acres of land and sports a four-car garage. Real estate web sites put its value at about $800,000 – well above the national sales price average of about $296,000 for an existing single family home.

The Center for Responsive Politics puts his mortgage at between $250,000 and $500,000.

That puts his likely monthly housing costs at between $3,000 and $4,000 – less than 10% of the household income. Most Americans must allocate between 25% and 50% of their monthly income to housing. Chaffetz doesn’t get into that range even when you add in a Washington apartment.

Frankly, you have to wonder just how bad Congress members are at managing money if they have income that puts them amongst the highest earners in the nation and still can’t come up with a budget that works.

Maybe that’s why they can’t make any headway on reducing the federal budget deficit.

As for Chaffetz, he could benefit from his own advice to cash-strapped Americans trying to figure out how to pay for health insurance.

“Americans have choices, and they’ve got to make a choice. So rather than getting that new iPhone that they just love and want to go spend hundreds of dollars on that, maybe they should invest in their own health care,” Chaffetz told CNN in a March interview.

With financial resources many times that of the average American, members of Congress could find ways to afford housing in Washington if they made a sincere effort.

But it would be a lot easier just to stick taxpayers with the bill.

To get full access to all Money Morning content, click here

About Money Morning: Money Morning gives you access to a team of ten market experts with more than 250 years of combined investing experience – for free. Our experts – who have appeared on FOXBusiness, CNBC, NPR, and BloombergTV – deliver daily investing tips and stock picks, provide analysis with actions to take, and answer your biggest market questions. Our goal is to help our millions of e-newsletter subscribers and Moneymorning.com visitors become smarter, more confident investors.

Disclaimer: © 2017 Money Morning and Money Map Press. All Rights Reserved. Protected by copyright of the United States and international treaties. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution (electronic or otherwise, including the world wide web), of content from this webpage, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of Money Morning. 16 W. Madison St. Baltimore, MD, 21201.

The post These Congressmen Want You to Pay for Their Second Home appeared first on Money Morning – We Make Investing Profitable.

Wall Street Examiner Disclosure:Lee Adler, The Wall Street Examiner reposts third party content with the permission of the publisher. I am a contractor for Money Map Press, publisher of Money Morning, Sure Money, and other information products. I curate posts here on the basis of whether they represent an interesting and logical point of view, that may or may not agree with my own views. Some of the content includes the original publisher's promotional messages. In some cases I receive promotional consideration on a contingent basis, when paid subscriptions result. The opinions expressed in these reposts are not those of the Wall Street Examiner or Lee Adler, unless authored by me, under my byline. No endorsement of third party content is either expressed or implied by posting the content. Do your own due diligence when considering the offerings of information providers.

Leave a Reply