“The Fed’s remedies are likely to lead straight to the kind of depression the Fed set out to avoid in the first place.”
So warned Jim Rickards in his 2011 runaway best-seller, Currency Wars.
In fact, Jim argued the “new Depression” had already begun.
Liquidity moves markets!Click here to learn how you can follow the money.
The official commentariat ridiculed Jim at the time.
After all, the economy had just recovered from a technical recession in 2009.
And it was in technical expansion by 2011, courtesy of the Fed’s heroic fling at the printing press.
But Jim maintained mainstream analysts failed to understand the meaning of “depression.”
They changed the goalposts in the 1960s.
Under the new rules, depressions were bugaboos of the past. Monetary “fine-tuning” and other modern refinements carried the day
But was Jim right all along?
Is the American economy locked in a depression… with no end in sight?
And is the U.S. now like Japan — down with a chronic wasting disease?
These are the questions we ponder this delightful spring afternoon…
John Maynard Keynes defined depression as a “chronic condition of subnormal activity for a considerable period without any marked tendency either toward recovery or toward complete collapse.”
Not year upon year of negative GDP. Or mass unemployment. Or soup lines or dust bowls…
But a “chronic condition of subnormal activity for a considerable period without any marked tendency either toward recovery or toward complete collapse.”
The historic long-term growth trend for U.S. GDP — 1947–2017 — is just over 3%.
Last year U.S. GDP grew less than 3%… for the 11th straight year.
“That is the meaning of depression exactly as Keynes defined it,” says Jim.
“It is not negative growth,” Jim clarifies. “But it is below-trend growth.”
It’s also a record case of the blues…
Each year since 1930, the Bureau of Economic Analysis has calculated the change in inflation-adjusted (real) GDP.
For 86 years going, these United States have only one 11-year stretch — 2006–2016 — when annual GDP failed to grow 3%.
The second-longest stretch?
Four years… 1930–1933…
The locust years of the Great Depression.
With the displeasure of repeating ourself…
The U.S. economy is currently on year 11 of sub-3% growth.
And gunning hard for number 12…
First quarter GDP came out today.
Numbers show the U.S. economy grew just 0.07% in the first quarter — the slowest rate in three years.
The remaining three quarters will have to come in Bunyanesque for GDP to crack 3% on the year.
And so the record 11th year under 3%… will likely become the 12th record year under 3%.
How did we come to this pass?
The Federal Reserve has taken its balance sheet from about $800 billion to $4.5 trillion since 2008.
The stock market trades at record highs.
So… why has the U.S. economy been so down in the mouth these 11 years?
“Growth is the key,” argues Jim Rickards.
And the money quote:
“The problem is we can’t do it by printing money.”
“The current economic slump is not cyclical,” Jim continues. “It’s structural. This is a new depression that will last indefinitely until structural changes are made to the economy.”
Overhauling the tax code… gutting useless regulation… reforming entitlements… bringing the Keystone pipeline online.
Jim says Japan’s been in a depression for 25 years because it hasn’t made the required structural changes to its economy.
And he laments, “The U.S. is now like Japan.”
Here we have a portrait not so much of collapse but of grayish twilight…
Of a long, drizzle-flogged November…
Of a cold that never ends.
After 11 years of subtrend growth going on 12… can Trump jump-start the American growth machine?
Based on his first 100 days and the forces aligned against him… we can only say we’re unconvinced.
“It’s never paid to bet against America,” counters Warren Buffett in cheery Midwestern optimism.
“It’s not always a smooth ride,” he says, but “we come through things.”
We sure hope he’s right.
And he is called the “Sage” of Omaha for a reason… right?…
Wall Street Examiner Disclaimer: The Wall Street Examiner reposts third party content with the permission of the publisher. I curate these posts on the basis of whether they represent an interesting and logical point of view, that may or may not agree with my own views. Some of the content includes the original publisher's promotional messages. In some cases promotional consideration is paid on a contingent basis, when paid subscriptions result. The opinions expressed in these reposts are not those of the Wall Street Examiner or Lee Adler and no endorsement of the content so provided is either expressed or implied by our posting the content. The Wall Street Examiner makes no endorsement or recommendation regarding them. Do your own due diligence when considering the offerings of third party providers.