We searched the dictionary for the definition of “politician” and found this picture with the attached caption:
Here’s then Republican House Speaker John Boehner on Obamacare in 2012, doing his best Patrick Henry: “Anything short of [a repeal] is unacceptable… Our goal has been, and will remain, full repeal.”
Liquidity moves markets!Click here to learn how you can follow the money.
Now here’s former Republican House Speaker John Boehner in 2017, proving the 2012 version was just piping sunshine up our nethers: “[It’s just] happy talk… I started laughing… I shouldn’t have called it repeal and replace, because that’s not what’s going to happen.”
(Winston Churchill once said a politician needs the ability to foretell the future… and the ability afterward to explain why it didn’t happen.)
The Republican-led House passed six bills to repeal Obamacare when Obama was president. Six! That is, the Republican-led House passed six bills to repeal Obamacare when these bills had zero chance of making it past the presidential veto pen.
But now that Trump wields the pen, they haven’t passed any.
In January, House Speaker Paul Ryan and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell hatched a plan to repeal Obamacare within 200 days.
Couldn’t they have rolled out any of the previous six bills? Why wait 200 days?
If we didn’t know any better, we’d think these Republicans were taking us for a sleigh ride.
House Freedom Caucus chairman Mark Meadows is one Republican hot for repeal. Our suspicions are his:
“I think a lot of people are looking to some of the policy debates to be an excuse not to vote on repealing the Affordable Care Act.”
Here’s the rub:
Trump’s promised to replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA) without touching entitlement programs like Medicare. But many congressional Republicans admit their own plan wouldn’t cover the millions who gained coverage under Obamacare.
And many people — many potential voters — would lose coverage without a simultaneous plan to replace. Giving something and taking it away is much harder than never giving it at all.
Now, Trump’s pledged a replacement bill in March. A draft of that bill has already been leaked… like everything else in Washington these days.
But it’s apparently repeal and replace in name only. Or “Obamacare Lite,” as David Stockman styles it.
It’s apparently junked up with all kinds of tax credits and other flummery, making it, in the words of Meadows, nothing short of an “entitlement program”:
“What is conservative about a new entitlement program and a new tax increase?”
Republican Rep. Mark Walker, wearing his green eyeshades, also sees a sham:
There are serious problems with what appears to be our current path to repeal and replace Obamacare. The draft legislation… risks continuing major Obamacare entitlement expansions and delays any reforms.
Then he strips the varnish, exposing the plan as the old kick the can down the road game politicians can’t resist:
It kicks the can down the road in the hope that a future Congress will have the political will and fiscal discipline to reduce spending that this Congress apparently lacks. Worse still, the bill contains what increasingly appears to be a new health insurance entitlement with a Republican stamp on it.
The congressman’s prayer: Lord, give me the political will and fiscal discipline to reduce spending. Just not yet.
But here’s where the needle scratches the wax…
Trump has said he can’t work up a budget or tax cuts without first tackling health care:
Statutorily and for budget purposes… we have to do health care before we do the tax cut. The tax cut is going to be major, it’s going to be simple and the whole tax plan is wonderful but I can’t do it until we do health care.
Wonderful, no doubt. But what if he can’t get health care done if the Meadows and Walker wing of the party sinks it? Does that mean no tax reform? Much of his economic agenda rests on it.
Trump evidently plans to raise health care in tonight’s address before a joint session of Congress. He says he’ll offer “something special.”
“I think you’ll like what you hear,” Trump purred.
We hope he’s right. Yet we’re tied up to a harsh and relentless cynicism…
It’s not every day that we find ourself on all fours with New York Sen. Chuckie Schumer. But we suspect he’s onto something when he says, “I believe the odds are very high that we will keep the ACA and it will not be repealed.”
Wall Street Examiner Disclaimer:Lee Adler, The Wall Street Examiner reposts third party content with the permission of the publisher. I am also a contractor for Money Map Press, publisher of Money Morning, Sure Money, and other information products. I curate posts here on the basis of whether they represent an interesting and logical point of view, that may or may not agree with my own views. Some of the content includes the original publisher's promotional messages. In some cases promotional consideration is paid on a contingent basis, when paid subscriptions result. The opinions expressed in these reposts are not those of the Wall Street Examiner or Lee Adler, unless authored by me, under my byline. No endorsement of third party content is either expressed or implied by posting the content. Do your own due diligence when considering the offerings of information providers.