It turns out Prince was a gold bug. According to a recent statement filed in Minnesota court regarding the settlement of his estate, at the time of his death he owned no stocks or bonds but he did own nearly a million dollars worth of gold bars along with 12 separate tracts of bare land worth over $25 million. He also held very little cash so it might be more accurate to say he was a fan of “real assets” over financial ones.
Investors have literally been partying like it’s 1999 in the markets for financial assets recently. The total value of corporate debt and equity relative to gross value added is now just as high as it was back then during the peak of the dotcom bubble. So it’s hard to blame Prince for favoring real assets at a time when they have never been cheaper relative to these extreme valuations in financial assets.
Now the average investor should probably be diversified across both kinds of investment assets. But I think it’s safe to assume most are far too heavily overweighted in financial assets like stocks and bonds and have little or no exposure to real assets like gold and real estate. This is just a sign o’ the times.
Financial assets have benefitted greatly by the extreme dovishness we have witnessed at the Fed over the better part of the past decade. Over that time, inflation has largely been confined to the financial markets. However, the risks of these policies are still not fully understood their consequences could prove to be severe.
There are plenty of times throughout history where ignoring real assets in favor of financial ones has been very painful. As Ray Dalio has said, “if you don’t own gold you know neither history nor economics.” Investors who do own real assets including gold today are simply buying insurance against the prospect of seeing a time when doves cry.
Wall Street Examiner Disclaimer: The Wall Street Examiner reposts third party content with the permission of the publisher. I curate these posts on the basis of whether they represent an interesting and logical point of view, that may or may not agree with my own views. Some of the content includes the original publisher's promotional messages. In some cases promotional consideration is paid on a contingent basis, when paid subscriptions result. The opinions expressed in these reposts are not those of the Wall Street Examiner or Lee Adler and no endorsement of the content so provided is either expressed or implied by our posting the content. The Wall Street Examiner makes no endorsement or recommendation regarding them. Do your own due diligence when considering the offerings of third party providers.