The outspoken Democrat issued a scathing public letter via his own website to FBI Director James Comey yesterday (Sunday).
He criticized Comey’s disclosure last Friday (Oct. 28) that the FBI is reopening its investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails based on new evidence the agency recently obtained.
Liquidity moves markets!Click here to learn how you can follow the money.
Don’t Miss: This YUGE 325% profit opportunity from our Chief Investment Strategist Keith Fitz-Gerald – which is only available until tomorrow…
Reid’s scathing memo accused Comey of “partisan actions” and even suggested he “may have broken the law.” This latter statement is in reference to the Hatch Act of 1939, which bars the use of an executive branch position to influence an election.
But these indictments weren’t the most shocking revelations to come from Reid’s letter…
The “October Surprise” in Harry Reid’s Buried Lede
The senator also dropped the bomb that the FBI and national security experts possess “explosive information” about ties and coordination between Russia and Donald Trump and his campaign.
“In my communications with you and other top officials in the national security community,” Reid wrote, “it has become clear that you possess explosive information about close ties and coordination between Donald Trump, his top advisors, and the Russian government – a foreign interest openly hostile to the United States, which Trump praises at every opportunity.”
Reid then pointed out the “disturbing double standard” in Comey’s treatment of sensitive information between the Democrats and the Republicans with a “clear intent” to aid one over the other in the 2016 presidential election.
“You rushed to take this step eleven days before a presidential election,” he wrote, “despite the fact that for all you know, the information you possess could be entirely duplicative of the information you already examined which exonerated Secretary Clinton.”
To be clear, there is no public evidence to support Reid’s claim of actual collusion between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin. Were that to be the case, it would be a scandal of epic proportions — one for which there’s actually no clear precedent. Its aftermath would be uncertain, at best.
Whether Reid’s correct that there’s hard evidence Trump is using a tie with Russia or that Comey has broken federal law, here’s the aftermath we’re facing in months to come…
As for Comey breaking the Hatch Act, should he be found guilty of doing so, he’d likely lose his position and his federal salary and pension, but would not serve hard time.
About Money Morning: Money Morning gives you access to a team of ten market experts with more than 250 years of combined investing experience – for free. Our experts – who have appeared on FOXBusiness, CNBC, NPR, and BloombergTV – deliver daily investing tips and stock picks, provide analysis with actions to take, and answer your biggest market questions. Our goal is to help our millions of e-newsletter subscribers and Moneymorning.com visitors become smarter, more confident investors.
Disclaimer: © 2016 Money Morning and Money Map Press. All Rights Reserved. Protected by copyright of the United States and international treaties. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution (electronic or otherwise, including the world wide web), of content from this webpage, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of Money Morning. 16 W. Madison St. Baltimore, MD, 21201.
The post Is the FBI Sitting on a Massive October Surprise for Donald Trump? appeared first on Money Morning – We Make Investing Profitable.
Wall Street Examiner Disclosure:Lee Adler, The Wall Street Examiner reposts third party content with the permission of the publisher. I am a contractor for Money Map Press, publisher of Money Morning, Sure Money, and other information products. I curate posts here on the basis of whether they represent an interesting and logical point of view, that may or may not agree with my own views. Some of the content includes the original publisher's promotional messages. In some cases I receive promotional consideration on a contingent basis, when paid subscriptions result. The opinions expressed in these reposts are not those of the Wall Street Examiner or Lee Adler, unless authored by me, under my byline. No endorsement of third party content is either expressed or implied by posting the content. Do your own due diligence when considering the offerings of information providers.