How the AT&T-Time Warner Merger Is Proof of a Rigged System

This is a syndicated repost courtesy of Money Morning - We Make Investing Profitable. To view original, click here. Reposted with permission.

Share!Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInEmail this to someonePrint this page

On Saturday, AT&T Inc. (NYSE: T) officially announced plans to buy Time Warner Inc. (NYSE: TWX) for more than $85 billion.

Pending regulatory approval, the AT&T-Time Warner merger would be one of the largest media mergers of all time. But it’s also a marriage between two very different companies:

  • Time Warner creates content: HBO, Warner Brothers film studios, CNN, TBS, and TNT. It also owns DC Entertainment (home to Batman and Superman) and has a 10% stake in the Hulu streaming subscription service.
  • AT&T provides platforms (wireless, phone, cable) on which consumers can access this content.

In a perfect world, it seems like a pragmatic move – a content company pairing with a mobile distribution network – especially when it comes to streaming videos, which is now the preferred content platform by mobile users nationwide.

In fact, 46% of all video plays last year were on mobile devices like tablets and smartphones. And since 2013, tablet and smartphone video consumption has grown a whopping 170%.

But back in the real world, there are some troubling implications for the public in regards to the Time Warner-AT&T merger.

How the AT&T-Time Warner Merger Affects Verizon and Sprint Users

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) approved net neutrality rules on Feb. 26, 2014. These rules are supposed to prevent Internet service providers (ISPs) like juggernauts Comcast and Verizon from:

  1. Discriminating against smaller content providers such as Charter Communications and Mediacom
  2. Unfairly favoring their own content over that of their competitors

Don’t Miss: How to Make a Killing… When Everyone Else Is Panicking

The Time Warner-AT&T merger will have to pass through regulatory obstacles ahead. But should the union gain approval with few changes made to lessen the chance of a primarily negative impact on consumers, then we’ll have definitive proof the industry has rigged its way around the net neutrality regulations. All while thwarting competition, creating unfair pricing, and inciting more media consolidation…

Issues that the FCC knows all about and is just letting happen…

You see, since February 2014 (the net neutrality regulations) U.S. cell phone users have seen the rise of “zero-rating” plans: wireless provider services that promise no penalties against a consumer’s data plan for accessing particular content. For example, T-Mobile’s “BingeOn” program allows subscribers to stream video from numerous content services (think: YouTube and Netflix) — so long as the content providers opt in to the program.

One big concern about the Time Warner-AT&T merger is that it could make its own offerings available via “zero-rating.” In other words, if you are an AT&T customer obsessed with, say, “Game of Thrones” – then you’re in luck. Time Warner owns HBO, so as an AT&T user, you would have free access to stream the series with no additional cost, including data usage minutes docked.

But if you are signed up with a rival telecom company like Sprint or Verizon, you might have to pay more for access to the popular TV series.

Or you may be persuaded to switch providers — or just have to go without access.

There is much speculation regarding why the FCC hasn’t yet stepped in to halt zero-rating practices. Last December, the Commission did ask Comcast Corp. (Nasdaq: CMCSA), T-Mobile U.S. Inc. (Nasdaq: TMUS), and AT&T to provide information about promotions that allow unlimited streaming of video from specific content providers.

“This is to help us stay informed as to what the practices are,” Tom Wheeler, the chairman of the FCC, said about the letter, according to The New York Times on Dec. 17, 2015.

That’s a somewhat concerning admittance in and of itself – that the FCC doesn’t appear to understand the basics of the zero-rating practices already at work on U.S. consumers.

Nothing to date has come from that inquiry.

 

To get full access to all Money Morning content, click here

About Money Morning: Money Morning gives you access to a team of ten market experts with more than 250 years of combined investing experience – for free. Our experts – who have appeared on FOXBusiness, CNBC, NPR, and BloombergTV – deliver daily investing tips and stock picks, provide analysis with actions to take, and answer your biggest market questions. Our goal is to help our millions of e-newsletter subscribers and Moneymorning.com visitors become smarter, more confident investors.

Disclaimer: © 2016 Money Morning and Money Map Press. All Rights Reserved. Protected by copyright of the United States and international treaties. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution (electronic or otherwise, including the world wide web), of content from this webpage, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of Money Morning. 16 W. Madison St. Baltimore, MD, 21201.

 

The post How the AT&T-Time Warner Merger Is Proof of a Rigged System appeared first on Money Morning – We Make Investing Profitable.

Wall Street Examiner Disclosure:Lee Adler, The Wall Street Examiner reposts third party content with the permission of the publisher. I am a contractor for Money Map Press, publisher of Money Morning, Sure Money, and other information products. I curate posts here on the basis of whether they represent an interesting and logical point of view, that may or may not agree with my own views. Some of the content includes the original publisher's promotional messages. In some cases I receive promotional consideration on a contingent basis, when paid subscriptions result. The opinions expressed in these reposts are not those of the Wall Street Examiner or Lee Adler, unless authored by me, under my byline. No endorsement of third party content is either expressed or implied by posting the content. Do your own due diligence when considering the offerings of information providers.

Leave a Reply