There is little doubt (unless you listen to politicians and their sales force) that the recovery from The Great Recession has been underwhelming.
In fact, it is the first recovery since 1930 where the annual rate of growth in real GDP has not exceeded 3%. Although the brief interval between the 1981 and 1983 recessions only generated 2.6% annual growth during 1982.
And this dubious achievement of sub-3% real GDP growth was in spite of the massive intervention of the Federal Reserve in terms of the Fed Funds effective rate and quantitative easing (QE).
Liquidity moves markets!Click here to learn how you can follow the money.
In terms of U-3 unemployment, the peak unemployment rate of The Great Recession was less than the peak rate of the 1982 recession. But the decline of unemployment after the 1982 recession was more impressive (down from 11.4% to 5% or a change of 6.4) than the recovery from The Great Recession (down from 10.6% to 5.1% or a chnage of 5.5).
Notice that after every recession the unemployment rate improves, just some more than others.
But what REALLY hasn’t improved since The Great Recession is median household income. Since the end of 2008, median household income YoY has grown an average of 1.2%. But since 1983, median household income grew an average of 3.4% YoY (until 2014).
Average hourly earnings YoY is also lower since 2008 than the average from 1984 to 2008 (+3.2% YoY versus 2.1% YoY).
In addition to the Fed’s intervention, did I mention the Federal government gorging on debt issuance at low rates to fund the government?
Yes, the attempted recovery from The Great Recession (which was not as bad as the 1982 recession) required massive market distortions from The Federal Reserve and a gargantuan surve in Federal government borrowing. All that to generate low wage growth.
Wall Street Examiner Disclaimer: The Wall Street Examiner reposts third party content with the permission of the publisher. I curate these posts on the basis of whether they represent an interesting and logical point of view, that may or may not agree with my own views. Some of the content includes the original publisher's promotional messages. In some cases promotional consideration is paid on a contingent basis, when paid subscriptions result. The opinions expressed in these reposts are not those of the Wall Street Examiner or Lee Adler and no endorsement of the content so provided is either expressed or implied by our posting the content. The Wall Street Examiner makes no endorsement or recommendation regarding them. Do your own due diligence when considering the offerings of third party providers.