Why More Stimulus Wouldn’t Save the Market

This is a syndicated repost courtesy of Money Morning - We Make Investing Profitable. To view original, click here. Reposted with permission.

Share!Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInEmail this to someonePrint this page

We’ve seen this time and again in the Age of Quantitative Easing: Stocks rally whenever central banks talk stimulus.

On the face of it, it’s absurd that governments would direct the supposedly independent central banks, with the aim of boosting the stock market. That sounds like a conspiracy theory.

Unfortunately, that conspiracy happens to be true. They haven’t tried very hard to hide it.

Of course that’s not how it’s “supposed” to be, but we all know it happens; we all know who funds central banks’ money-printing sprees. And we all know that the trillions of dollars they create act like a tidal wave of cash that lifts share prices.

Take the gains that brings, by all means, but please don’t have any illusions that these gains are even remotely healthy.

Rather, it’s a sign of profound addiction. But that’s not even the most worrisome thing in play here…

What’s Keeping Markets Down

stimulusWorse, there are signs that not even QE can boost these markets much more.

The most recent central bank to openly hint at stimulus is, of course, Mario Draghi’s European Central Bank.

In the middle of February, Draghi put stimulus back in the spotlight in a big way, when he said worries over China and the pace of growth in the Eurozone might compel the bank to extend its 1.1 trillion euro bond-buying spree, and even more euros might begin flooding the markets and the EU economy as early as this month, March 2016.

What happened next was as predictable as it is troubling…

Like you’d expect, the euro began to slide against the U.S. dollar just as soon as Draghi left the podium. That’s not surprising; stimulus has a devaluing effect on currency.

But European stocks, the FTSE 100 in the United Kingdom (which is of course independent of the euro but strongly impacted by it nonetheless), the CAC 40 in France, and the DAX in Germany, barely moved at all, rather less than 1% across the board, either way.

That’s not at all what investors have been “trained” to expect from this market. Draghi’s nod to more stimulus should have sent European shares to the moon, but the fact that the reaction was so muted is telling.

The reaction says everything really…

Quantitative Easing, Unmasked

From this reaction, we can see the true nature of this kind of stimulus: It’s like a drug.

Markets got loaded on the good times as the initial rounds of easing played out in the United States in 2008 and Europe in 2009. The party was one of the longest (yet least-trusted) bull markets in history.

But… like any drug addict, markets need more and more of the drug to feel the effects of the high for the same length of time. From here on out, any kind of rally that happens on news of more easing, be it in the United States, UK, or European Union, should be viewed as liable to pull back almost as quickly.

In fact, for the time being, most rallies in this market should be looked at with a healthy degree of skepticism. Like I said, take the gains, but do so with your eyes open.

These rallies and their accompanying pullbacks are likely to be violent – remember, 19 of the 20 single biggest “up” days in the market over the past 25 years have all come during bear or “down” markets.

Now, it is possible to make money – good money – in this market; options tend to be great for this. My Stealth Profits Trader readers have made five triple-digit gains since the new year, whereas the Dow Jones Industrial Average has lost more than 3.3%.

But this is a market for trading, not investing. The best approach is to move quickly on confirmation of the short-term momentum of a stock (my Stealth Stock Trading Indicator is a great tool for determining this), with a sound, well-defined exit strategy and trailing stops in place.

I think we can expect this “traders’ market” to continue until the world goes “cold turkey” on stimulus and starts to look – like we used to – at strong fundamentals as the reason to buy.

It’s going to be hard for a generation hooked on low interest rates and easy money, but the result is the same as it would be for anyone kicking a bad habit. The reward is a stronger overall stock market and a healthier economy.

Until that happens, I’m expecting the market to trade sideways or down amid these “bounces” for at least the next three to six months.

To get full access to all Money Morning content, click here

About Money Morning: Money Morning gives you access to a team of ten market experts with more than 250 years of combined investing experience – for free. Our experts – who have appeared on FOXBusiness, CNBC, NPR, and BloombergTV – deliver daily investing tips and stock picks, provide analysis with actions to take, and answer your biggest market questions. Our goal is to help our millions of e-newsletter subscribers and Moneymorning.com visitors become smarter, more confident investors.

Disclaimer: © 2016 Money Morning and Money Map Press. All Rights Reserved. Protected by copyright of the United States and international treaties. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution (electronic or otherwise, including the world wide web), of content from this webpage, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of Money Morning. 16 W. Madison St. Baltimore, MD, 21201.

The post Why More Stimulus Wouldn’t Save the Market appeared first on Money Morning – We Make Investing Profitable.

Wall Street Examiner Disclaimer:Lee Adler, The Wall Street Examiner reposts third party content with the permission of the publisher. I am also a contractor for Money Map Press, publisher of Money Morning, Sure Money, and other information products. I curate posts here on the basis of whether they represent an interesting and logical point of view, that may or may not agree with my own views. Some of the content includes the original publisher's promotional messages. In some cases promotional consideration is paid on a contingent basis, when paid subscriptions result. The opinions expressed in these reposts are not those of the Wall Street Examiner or Lee Adler, unless authored by me, under my byline. No endorsement of third party content is either expressed or implied by posting the content. Do your own due diligence when considering the offerings of information providers.

Leave a Reply