A Tale Of Two Graphs——Why Bubble Finance Will Fail

This is a syndicated repost published with the permission of David Stockman's Contra Corner » Stockman’s Corner. To view original, click here. Opinions herein are not those of the Wall Street Examiner or Lee Adler. Reposting does not imply endorsement. The information presented is for educational or entertainment purposes and is not individual investment advice.

On Friday the BLS reported, among other things, that full-time employment in April had dropped by 252,000 from the prior month and that the weekly earnings of production workers had risen by the grand sum of 67 cents (0.1%) before inflation and taxes.  But why should still another confirmation that the main street job market is dead in the water stop the robo-traders from another romp higher?

In fact, this incongruous spectacle of dead wages and soaring financial assets has been going on for several decades now——a transparently obvious trend obfuscated by the unrelenting recency bias of the MSM and the authorized Wall Street/Washington narrative. So let Friday’s incongruous stock market rip serve as a portal into the ugly interior history of how central bank bubble finance has fostered an existential crisis in what remains of American capitalism.

On the main street side, this isn’t a matter of sluggish recovery from a mysterious financial crisis that arrived, apparently, on a comet from deep space in September 2008. Alas, for three decades running now, the constant dollar weekly wages of full-time workers have been flat as a pancake.

And let’s be clear. We are not talking here about after school jobs held by quasi-perpetual students, the meager pay of moonlighting moms or the episodic work gigs of society’s tens of million of loosely attached drifters.

To be sure, the ranks of these marginal job holders have become immense according to the Social Security Administration’s most recent authoritative data—– and it is “authoritative” compared to most of Washington’s statistical mill flotsam because its based on the payroll records of millions of employers who generally do not withhold taxes from ghosts. To wit, there were about 50 million low wage job holders (under $15k/year) who as a group earned an average gross pay of just $6,000 in 2013. So unless there is wholesale violation of the minimum wage laws, upwards of one-third of the US labor force of 155 million is working about 15 hours per week at the lowest lawful pay rate per hour.

Call that a giant social problem. In truth, however, its not the half of the real crisis. The latter is shown in the graph below, which is for “full-time” workers defined by the BLS as being on the job at least 35 hours per week.

Thirty years after it was ostensibly “Morning in America”, full-time wage workers have gained only 0.1% per annum in their weekly pay envelope. That’s a rounding error—even if you believe that the BLS’ statistical shenanigans have actually captured cumulative inflation since 1986. In the real world, of course, actual inflation is much higher—-so real wages have self-evidently been sinking for 30 years.

Nor does this stagnant trend in real wage rates  tell the entire story. The Friday “jobs” report also showed that the share of the prime work age population holding any kind of job—–even a few hours per week “coding” or delivering pizzas—–is now down by fully 10 percentage points from the level it gained after women had fully entered the labor force in the 1990s.

 Needless to say, even as the main street economy of work and production has been going nowhere, the financial system has erupted skyward. During the last 35 years according to the Fed’s flow-of-funds calculations, the sum of credit market debt outstanding plus the market value of equities has soared from $6 trillion to $95 trillion or by 15X. By contrast, since 1981 the nominal GDP has risen by only 5X.

This is “financialization” in its full brobdingnagian glory.  A financial sphere which had occupied 212% of GDP in 1981 now weighs in at 537%.  And, no, the starting figure does not represent some temporarily aberrant low bequeathed by the hapless Jimmy Carter; the 1981 ratio was actually the historic norm. During the halcyon times of 1955, for instance, the sum of credit market debt and equity market value actually posted slightly lower at 197% of GDP.

So the elephant in the room is the nearly $90 trillion of gain in financial market value during the last 35 years. In a word, it represents a heaping pile of inflation——both the traditional CPI kind and the new style financial inflation inaugurated by the Greenspan Fed, as well.

Stated in constant 2015 dollars, real GDP was $7.2 trillion in 1981, meaning that it has grown by about 2.5X over the last three and one-half decades to $17.7 trillion at present. All the rest of the 15X gain in financial market value since then is not reflective of capitalism, or human greed or even “deregulation” at work. This is the baleful handiwork of a rogue central bank.

How did this massive inflation of the financial sphere happen? In a word, financial repression and the doctrine of wealth effects.

Since the time of Greenspan’s abject panic in the wake of Black Monday in October 1987, the Fed has chronically pegged the money market rate below market clearing levels, thereby fueling an embedded carry trade that has mushroomed relentlessly. And this isn’t just about the record $485 billion of margin debt outstanding or even the several trillions of repo trades that are captured by current reporting systems.

No, the entire financial system is infected by the endemic carry trades which result from falsification of the money market by the Fed. There are upwards of $50 trillion of futures, options and OTC “bespoke” contracts outstanding, for example, but they are inherently and systematically mispriced owing to the pegging of money market rates at zero percent for the last 7 years and at a fixed, below-market rate for the past 30 years. The economic evil is as much in the pegging as in the zero bound level because it is the powerhouse peg of the fed that reduces the risk of carrying financial assets with cheap short-term borrowings.

And the wealth effects doctrine only compounds the deformation. That is, it reduces the price risk of carrying financial assets with high levels of repo or options leverage because of the Fed’s “put” under the market. The latter, of course, is an anomalous artifact of bubble finance which is believed by nearly 100% of the gamblers but denied by virtually all of the money printers.

But the proof is in the pudding. Downside hedges (i.e. puts on the S&P 500 in their most basic form) are dirt cheap owing to the willingness of market makers to collect nickels on downside insurance, knowing that the Fed is pledged to keep the steamroller of 10-20% market breaks at bay.  Indeed, the S&P 500 path shown below could not happen in a free market—–even one with far more healthy fundamentals that the floundering recovery of the past six years.

In short, in an honest free market gamblers would have to pay more for their carry funding, face much greater uncertainty as to its price and availability and dissipate for more of their winnings hedging their portfolios than is required under the current central bank driven regime of bubble finance.The contra factual thus presents itself. Namely, would the value of corporate equity have soared from $1.3 trillion to $36.5 trillion or by 28X since 1981 in an honest free market?

Next, throw into the mix the Fed’s severe interest rate repression in the bond market and you get more financial inflation. When debt is priced drastically below its economic cost and receives a deep tax subsidy to boot, a variation of the supply side theorem manifests itself. Namely, when the cost of servicing debt capital is made artificially low, you get a lot more of it—–from the public and private sectors alike. As to the former, the present day proclivity of politicians to kick-the-fiscal-can is a direct consequence of financial repression.

With respect to the latter, consider the explosion of corporate bond issuance, which in 1981 amounted to just $550 billion or a mere 17% of GDP. Today that figure is $11.6 trillion or 20X larger and amounts to 65% of GDP. Yet, self-evidently, that explosion of new borrowings did not go into the acquisition of productive assets. If it had, real GDP would have grown a lot more rapidly than the 2.7% rate recorded for the 33 years ending in December 2014—-and by the mere 1.1% recorded during the sub-period since Q4 2007.

Instead, the debt was overwhelmingly used for financial engineering—-or what is ultimately a Ponzi scheme by which new corporate borrowings are used to shrink the outstanding float of stock via LBOs, stock buybacks and cash M&A deals. Consequently, carry trade gamblers are enabled to bid up the shrunken supply of secondary markets equities to ever higher levels.

Not surprisingly, therefore, the US corporate sector’s market capitalization has exploded from $2 trillion in 1981 to $48 trillion at present. That right. The nominal value of corporate debt at par plus equity at market has risen by 24X, and most of that gain has occurred since the inauguration of monetary central planning under Greenspan in October 1987.

The above graph surely hints at the dangerous instability fostered by bubble finance. And it is not by happenstance that the Greenspan Fed essentially threw in the towel when it authorized so-called “sweep accounts” on bank deposits in the early 1990s—-a maneuver that essentially eliminated reserve requirements on traditional checking account money. Not only does this mean that required reserves in the banking system now amount to a laughably microscopic 0.4% of deposits, but the whole apparatus is irrelevant anyway because banks are now only a minor source of new credit in the bubble finance system.

What central bank bubble finance has actually unleashed is a self-fueling form of market asset-based credit creation. The options, futures and currency markets, for example, are based on what amounts to loans which are collateralized by small fractions (1-10%) of the underlying’s current market value. As valuations rise ever higher, collateral values follow and implicit leverage grows. It is a financial beanstalk.

At the end of the day, the collateral based finance embedded in the current $95 trillion level of US credit and equity outstanding is far more dangerous than the old fashioned fractional reserve lending of the pre-1990 banking system. At least under the old regime, bank regulators and central bankers like Volcker were steeped in the tradition of safe and sound commercial banking.

By contrast, the post-Greenspan central bankers have opened a Pandora Box of market based hypothecated-finance, and they do not have a clue about the enormous resulting bubble they have unleashed. Nor do they understand that this $95 trillion monster is a voracious rent-seeking vampire squid that makes Goldman Sachs look little a piker. That is, the relentless trading, churning and synthesizing of assets and derivatives within the giant bloated system of finance has almost nothing to do with raising or allocating capital for productive use.

Instead, this giant $95 trillion pool is where honest savings from the household and business sectors go to be scalped, appropriated and stolen by the hedge funds, dealers, financial engineers and gamblers which populate the casino.

But here’s the thing. Maybe 100,000 people “live large” off the casino. By contrast, according to the Social Security Administration’s wage records, there were 100 million workers, or two-thirds of all Americans who held any kind of paying job during 2013, who earned a collective total of just $1.65 trillion that year. That amounts to the incredibly small sum of just $16,500 per average worker.

In short, full-time wage workers have been on a treadmill for decades; average pay for the overwhelming share of jobs celebrated by the talking heads on payroll Friday is pitifully low; and the central bank keeps its heavy foot on the monetary accelerator as it witlessly inflates a $95 trillion financial bubble that it stubbornly denies.

I have called this a tale of two graphs. But what it really describes is a clear and present danger to American capitalism fostered by an unelected monetary politburo in thrall to its own lust for power and mesmerized by its own doctrinaire group think. The tragedy is that nothing can stop them except the thundering crash of the gargantuan bubble they have single handedly enabled.