It’s Time to Climb Aboard the Oil-by-Rail Boom – Kent Moors – Money Morning

This is a syndicated repost courtesy of Money Morning. To view original, click here. Reposted with permission.

Share!Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInEmail this to someonePrint this page
Rail transit is about to make you some big money…in oil.That’s why I’ll be headed to Dallas in late August and Calgary mid-September for extensive meetings with all of the key players.I can promise you, that in a hurry this is going to get a lot bigger.

As it happens, I’ll be providing all of the details for average investors to profit from this monumental change.

Let me explain to you how all of this has suddenly come about…

It’s because a new price spread is emerging as the new engine for North American profits. The Brent-WTI spread may be the best known, but it’s not the only one.

The spread I’m talking about is the difference between the cost of West Texas Intermediate (WTI) and Western Canadian Select (WCS).

As its name suggests, WCS is the Canadian benchmark. It’s derived from the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin where over 90% of Canadian oil and gas is sourced. Since this Canadian oil is lower in quality, it sells at a steep discount to WTI.

There’s only one problem: It’s moving all of that oil south out of Canada.

Pipeline capacity is virtually filled and the prospects for the Keystone network expansion across the border are still in the grip of Washington politics. That’s not mention the time and expense of involved in building new pipelines anyway.

Fortunately, there is a simple and profitable answer: It’s the nation’s railroads. >

The New Oil Connection

Using railroads to move Canadian crude to the U.S. for processing has become one of the industry’s biggest trends. It’s literally transforming how crude is moved across the border.

This is especially true in places like Albany, New York and northwestern Washington State–both of which are quickly becoming major new hubs for the transport of Canadian oil to the U.S.

Loading stations are increasing north of the border as well as these shipments accelerate, with major railroad service providers anticipating heavier near term volume as the network expands.

But there’s another major development in the works…

The WCS-WTI spread is also about to provide a major boost to refinery margins (and profitability) across the border.

Here’s why: While the narrowing of the Brent-WTI spread, that I discussed earlier this week, is squeezing refinery margins big time in the U.S., it’s having no effect at all on the WTI-WCS spread.

That means the ongoing WCS discount (which has been in excess of $20 a barrel) will provide a way for U.S. refiners to introduce a new factor in improving profit margins.

As I noted earlier this month, that margin is critical for a refiner’s profits since it provides the difference between what it costs to produce oil products and would can be obtained at the initial wholesale point.

But there’s another more important factor. It’s called netbacking.

A Big Boon for Refineries

Netbacking is an approach that began to appear in the 1980s. It eliminates the uncertainty in the upstream (drilling)-midstream (transport)-downstream cost versus price sequence.

Here’s an example of how this pricing sequence works in the real world.

A producer needs a way to predict how much it can charge for its oil (the so-called wellhead price), while a refiner needs to offset its cost (the oil coming from the upstream producer) with the wholesale price it can charge. Meanwhile, at the end of the line, the distributor needs to be able to offset its cost (the price commanded by the refiner) with the retail price it can charge.

In this case the price of one becomes the next segment’s cost. Reliability in this chain is crucial to making a profit.

The inability to determine what that cost-price relationship is in another segment can become a major impediment to the application of working capital by each participant in the sequence.

Netbacks overcome this shortcoming by using the cost-price relationship at the refiner as a way of determining the same relationship further upstream or downstream.

All the costs of getting the crude to the market, such as shipment and refining costs are subtracted from the total revenues from the sale of the oil products. The net-figure produced is the netback price of the crude.

The cost-price adjustments made based on the netback simply allow the producer, refiner, and distributor to know what their margins are.

In this case, the refiner becomes the barometer and the netback emerges as a way of decreasing uncertainty.

From the refiner’s point of view, the spread between WCS and WTI allows for a more detailed determination of refinery margins (and profitability). That determination also serves as a foundation for activity further up and down the chain.

The New Age of Rail

That’s why the combination of the WTI-WCS spread and netbacking at U.S. refiners with guaranteed access to Canadian oil at a known discount is now about to become a much larger part of the American railroad picture.

As this trend develops, of course, we are going to be interested in which companies are going to benefit from this move of volume from the pipelines to the rail cars.

The first stage of this process is already in. In fact, Canadian National Railway (NYSE: CNI), one of the primary early beneficiaries of crude-by rail announced last week that its most recent quarterly revenues from crude transports were up 150% over last year.

The good news for investors is that the second stage has just begun and it promises to be even more profitable. And the meetings I’m consulting on over the next two months will give you a front row seat to all of the profits. So stay tuned…

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Wall Street Examiner Disclosure:Lee Adler, The Wall Street Examiner reposts third party content with the permission of the publisher. I am a contractor for Money Map Press, publisher of Money Morning, Sure Money, and other information products. I curate posts here on the basis of whether they represent an interesting and logical point of view, that may or may not agree with my own views. Some of the content includes the original publisher's promotional messages. In some cases I receive promotional consideration on a contingent basis, when paid subscriptions result. The opinions expressed in these reposts are not those of the Wall Street Examiner or Lee Adler, unless authored by me, under my byline. No endorsement of third party content is either expressed or implied by posting the content. Do your own due diligence when considering the offerings of information providers.

Leave a Reply